Cited by 1,244

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE PREDICTORS OF ADULT OFFENDER RECIDIVISM: WHAT WORKS!*

GENDREAU, PAUL, LITTLE, TRACY, GOGGIN, CLAIRE·1996·Criminology

Abstract

Meta‐analytic techniques were used to determine which predictor domains and actuarial assessment instruments were the best predictors of adult offender recidivism. One hundred and thirty‐one studies produced 1,141 correlations with recidivism. The strongest predictor domains were criminogenic needs, criminal history/history of antisocial behavior, social achievement, age/gender/race, and family factors. Less robust predictors included intellectual functioning, personal distress factors, and socioeconomic status in the family of origin. Dynamic predictor domains performed at least as well as the static domains. The LSI‐R was identified as the most useful actuarial measure. Recommendations for developing sound assessment practices in corrections are provided.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of age and total number of previous convictions is consistent with the conclusions of two meta-analysis studies.

    “The importance of these two criteria is consistent with the conclusions of two meta-analysis studies that set out to determine, in part, which criteria are most predictive of recidivism (8, 9).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 129

  1. Adams Don, 1976, The effects of prison residents' community contacts on recidivism rates, Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavioral Technology, Methods, and Therapy, 22, 21
  2. 10.1177/0093854887014001004 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/h0079959 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/002242787200900204 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1976.tb00003.x · DOI
  6. 10.1007/BF01066164 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/bsl.2370060209 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb01038.x · DOI
  9. 10.1002/1097-4679(198511)41:6<780::AID-JCLP2270410610>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1974.tb00641.x · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0160-2527(88)90024-6 · DOI
  12. Black Tony, 1985, Prediction in Criminology
  13. 10.1016/0160-2527(87)90030-6 · DOI
  14. Bonta James, 1989, Native inmates: Institutional response, risk, and needs, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 31, 49, 10.3138/cjcrim.31.1.49 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0093854885012003004 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/0022427887024004006 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01336.x · DOI
  18. Bonta James, 1992, The characteristics of aboriginal recidivists, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38, 517, 10.3138/cjcrim.34.3-4.517 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/000486589002300202 · DOI
  20. Broadhurst Roderick G., 1991, Sex Offending and Recidivism. Report No. 3. Crime Research Center
  21. 10.1177/0022427888025001005 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/002242787801500108 · DOI
  23. Buikhuisen W., 1974, Factors related to recidivism, British Journal of Criminology, 14, 62, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046511 · DOI
  24. Buikhuisen W., 1983, Prospective Studies of Crime and Delinquency
  25. Carlson Kenneth A., 1973, Some characteristics of recidivists in an Ontario institution for adult male first incarcerates, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 15, 397, 10.3138/cjcc.15.2.397 · DOI
  26. 10.2307/3053536 · DOI
  27. 10.1001/archpsyc.1973.04200020088012 · DOI
  28. Donnelly Henry C., 1991, 1985 Releases: Five Year Post Release Follow‐Up
  29. 10.1002/1098-2337(1984)10:3<201::AID-AB2480100304>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  30. 10.1007/978-94-009-6672-7_3 · DOI
  31. Farrington David P., 1982, Abnormal Offenders, Delinquency, and the Criminal Justice System
  32. 10.1177/002580247501500306 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/BF01650290 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/000276483027001004 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/009385487900600110 · DOI
  36. Gendreau Paul, 1979, Norms and recidivism for first incarcerates: Implications for programming, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 21, 416, 10.3138/cjcrim.21.4.416 · DOI
  37. Gibbens T.C.N., 1984, Borstal boys after 25 years, British Journal of Criminology, 24, 49, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047424 · DOI
  38. 10.1192/bjp.142.2.169 · DOI
  39. Gottfredson Michael R., 1980, Decision Making in Criminal Justice: Toward the Rational Exercise of Discretion
  40. Gottfredson Don M., 1978, Guidelines for Parole and Sentencing: A Policy Control Method
  41. Greenberg William M., 1993, Recidivism on an acute psychiatric forensic service, Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44, 583
  42. Grygier Tadeusz, 1971, Decision and outcome: Studies in parole prediction, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 13, 133, 10.3138/cjcc.13.2.133 · DOI
  43. Gunn J., 1978, Psychiatric Aspects of Imprisonment
  44. Hamparian Donna, 1987, The Prediction of Criminal Violence
  45. Hann Robert G., 1988, Release risk prediction: Testing the Nuffield scoring system for native and female inmates
  46. Hann Robert G., 1992, Predicting General Release Risk for Canadian Penitentiary Inmates
  47. Hare Robert D., 1988, Male psychopaths and their criminal careers, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 710, 10.1037/0022-006X.56.5.710 · DOI
  48. 10.1037/0022-006X.56.2.227 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/0160-2527(83)90027-4 · DOI
  50. Hodgins Sheilagh, 1987, Men found unfit to stand trial andlor not guilty by reason of insanity: Recidivism, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 29, 51, 10.3138/cjcrim.29.1.51 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/0047-2352(83)90006-5 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/0047-2352(74)90031-2 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/0047-2352(76)90041-6 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/0047-2352(80)90025-2 · DOI
  55. Hoffman Peter B., Bumout‐age at release from prison and recidivism, Journal of Criminal Justice, 12, 617, 10.1016/0047-2352(84)90118-1 · DOI
  56. 10.1177/0093854885012004007 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/BF01047502 · DOI
  58. Holcomb William R., 1988, Arrest rates among young adult psychiatric patients treated in inpatient and outpatient settings, Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39, 52
  59. 10.1037/0021-9010.68.2.203 · DOI
  60. 10.1037/0012-1649.20.6.1120 · DOI
  61. 10.1007/BF02088662 · DOI
  62. Jenkins W.O., 1977, The Behavioral Evaluation Treatment and Analysis (BETA) system in the prediction of criminal and delinquent behavior, Quarterly Journal of Corrections, 1, 44
  63. Kassebaum Gene G., 1971, Prison Treatment and Parole Survival: An Empirical Assessment
  64. Klein Stephen P., 1986, The Prevalence, Predictability, and Policy Implications of Recidivism
  65. 10.1192/bjp.152.1.80 · DOI
  66. Lambert Leah R., 1976, The adult female offender: The road from institution to community life, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 18, 3
  67. 10.1016/0191-8869(87)90133-4 · DOI
  68. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3570-5 · DOI
  69. LeBlanc Marc, 1993, The prediction of males' adolescent and adult offending from school experience, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 25, 459
  70. 10.1177/0306624X9203600407 · DOI
  71. 10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3f.1171 · DOI
  72. 10.1007/978-94-009-6672-7_10 · DOI
  73. MacnaughtonSmith P., 1976, Permission to be Slightly Free
  74. McCord Joan, 1982, Abnormal Offenders, Delinquency, and the Criminal Justice System
  75. McCord Joan, 1982, A forty year perspective on effects of child abuse and neglect, Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 265, 10.1016/0145-2134(83)90003-0 · DOI
  76. 10.1037/0021-843X.90.4.354 · DOI
  77. 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1978.tb00274.x · DOI
  78. McWilliams William, 1975, Sentencing and recidivism: An analysis by personality type, British Journal of Social Work, 5, 311
  79. 10.1007/BF01537887 · DOI
  80. 10.1007/BF02141545 · DOI
  81. Minor Kevin I., 1992, An evaluation of the Kalamazoo probation enhancement program, Federal Probation, 56, 30
  82. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1981.tb00528.x · DOI
  83. 10.1080/00332747.1987.11024366 · DOI
  84. 10.1037/0021-843X.90.2.152 · DOI
  85. Motiuk Laurence L.1991Antecedents and consequences of prison adjustment: A systematic assessment and reassessment approach.Unpublished doctoral dissertation Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada .
  86. Motiuk Laurence L., 1993, Research and Statistics Branch
  87. Motiuk Laurence L., 1993, The Validity of Offender Needs Identification and Analysis in Community Correction
  88. Motiuk Laurence L., 1988, Offender Riskmeeds Assessment: A Study of Conditional Releases
  89. Motiuk Laurence L., 1989, Field Test of the Community Risk/Needs Management Scale: A Study of Offenders on Case Load
  90. 10.1177/0093854886013001003 · DOI
  91. 10.1002/1520-6629(197401)2:1<83::AID-JCOP2290020129>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  92. 10.1300/J418v02n02_02 · DOI
  93. 10.1080/00224545.1977.9924028 · DOI
  94. 10.1192/bjp.125.1.60 · DOI
  95. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1982.tb00854.x · DOI
  96. Petersilia Joan, 1987, Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making
  97. 10.3109/10826087609056178 · DOI
  98. Porporino Frank J., Assessing models of predicting risk for criminal recidivism, Journal of Criminal Justice
  99. 10.1016/0191-8869(82)90058-7 · DOI
  100. Quinsey Vernon L., 1975, Oak Ridge patients: Prerelease characteristics and postrelease adjustment, Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 3, 63, 10.1177/009318537500300105 · DOI
  101. Rice Marnie E., 1991, Psychopathy, Schizophrenia, Alcohol Abuse and Violent Recidivism, 397
  102. 10.1037/0022-006X.59.3.381 · DOI
  103. Rice Marnie E., 1990, Criminological and Psychiatric Predictors of Recidivism among Male Insanity Acquittees
  104. Robins Lee N., 1980, The Social Consequences of Psychiatric Illness
  105. Robinson David, 1989, Validation of an Adult Offender Classification System for Newfoundland and Labrador
  106. Rogers Sally, 1981, Factors Related to Recidivism among Adult Probationers in Ontario
  107. 10.1300/J264v08n03_05 · DOI
  108. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1974.tb00629.x · DOI
  109. Serin Ralph C., 1990, Recidivism Prediction: A Comparison of the Psychopathy Checklist and Actuarial Risk Scales
  110. Serin Ralph C., 1993, Decision issues in risk assessment, Federal Probation, 5, 22
  111. 10.1037/1040-3590.2.4.419 · DOI
  112. Shannon Lyle W., 1985, Risk assessment vs, real prediction: The prediction problem and public trust. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1, 159
  113. 10.1037/0022-006X.57.6.710 · DOI
  114. 10.1176/ajp.130.3.317 · DOI
  115. Steadman Henry J., 1974, Careers of the Criminally Insane: Excessive Social Control of Deviance
  116. 10.1176/ajp.135.7.816 · DOI
  117. Tarling Roger, 1985, Prediction in Criminology
  118. Tennent Gavin, 1984, The English special hospital ‐ A 12–17 year follow up study: A comparison of violent and nonviolent re‐offenders and non‐offenders, Medicine, Science, and the Law, 24, 81, 10.1177/002580248402400204 · DOI
  119. Thornberry Terence P., 1979, The Criminally Insane: A Community Follow‐up of Mentally Ill Offenders
  120. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1988.tb00688.x · DOI
  121. 10.1177/002242787601300207 · DOI
  122. West Donald J., 1977, The Delinquent Way of Life
  123. 10.1016/0149-7189(90)90026-S · DOI
  124. 10.1126/science.2704995 · DOI · Paper page
  125. Wilbanks William L., 1985, Prediction in Criminology
  126. 10.1177/0093854884011001001 · DOI
  127. 10.1177/088626086001004002 · DOI
  128. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00291.x · DOI
  129. 10.1177/0093854890017001005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
GENDREAU, P., LITTLE, T., & GOGGIN, C.
Venue
Criminology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-11
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
575-608
ISSN
  • 0011-1384
  • 1745-9125
Cited by
1,244
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review