DEVELOPMENTAL AND LIFE‐COURSE CRIMINOLOGY: KEY THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ISSUES‐THE 2002 SUTHERLAND AWARD ADDRESS*
Abstract
The main aim of this paper is to advance knowledge and (especially) theories about developmental and life‐course criminology (DLC). First, I review the widely accepted DLC findings that all DLC theories have been designed to explain. Second, I review more contentious and unresolved empirical DLC issues that might present challenges to DLC theories. Third, I describe my own DLC theory and specify how it addresses key empirical and theoretical questions. Fourth, I summarize five important DLC theories, by Catalano and Hawkins, Sampson and Laub, Moffitt, LeBlanc, and Thornberry and Krohn. Fifth, I identify differences in assumptions and predictions between my theory and the other five theories. Finally, I recommend a detailed comparison of the key features of all DLC theories, of their answers to key empirical and theoretical questions, and of their predictions regarding key unresolved empirical DLC issues.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study employed one of the most rigorous nonexperimental methodological designs capable of accounting for a wide range of selection effects and confounding influences.
“First, we followed the call of previous research (see, e.g., Farrington, 2003; Murray et al., 2009; Piquero et al., 2011; Pogarsky, 2002) and employed one of the most rigorous nonexperimental methodological designs capable of accounting for a wide range of selection effects and confounding influences.”
From Does contact with the justice system deter or promote future delinquency? Results from a longitudinal study of British adolescent twins (2020) · cites this paper as Farrington, 2003
Cites
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621794 · Cited by 10,127 · see citing works
Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094589 · Cited by 8,856 · see citing works
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490057 · Cited by 1,418 · see citing works
Handbook of Adolescent Psychology
(2004) · doi:10.1002/9780471726746 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
Protective factors and resilience
Lösel, F., & Bender, D. (2003) · Early Prevention of Adult Antisocial Behaviour · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489259.006 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Handling Complex Meta-analytic Data Structures Using Robust Variance Estimates: a Tutorial in R
Tanner-Smith, E. E., Tipton, E., & Polanin, J. R. (2016) · Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology · doi:10.1007/s40865-016-0026-5 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Woolard, J., Graham, S., & Banich, M. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0014763 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Gender Differences in Life-Course Theory of Recidivism: A Survival Analysis
Benda, B. B. (2005) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x04271194 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Tolan, P. H., Henry, D. B., Schoeny, M. S., Lovegrove, P., & Nichols, E. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9181-4 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Does Recent Research on Adolescent Brain Development Inform the Mature Minor Doctrine?
Steinberg, L. (2013) · Journal of Medicine and Philosophy · doi:10.1093/jmp/jht017 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
‘I Wasn't Alone’: Collective Behaviour and Violent Delinquency
McGloin, J. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2009) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1375/acri.42.3.336 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Rekker, R., Pardini, D., Keijsers, L., Branje, S., Loeber, R., & Meeus, W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136461 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Motz, R. T., Barnes, J. C., Caspi, A., Arseneault, L., Cullen, F. T., Houts, R., Wertz, J., & Moffitt, T. E. (2020) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12236 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“First, we followed the call of previous research (see, e.g., Farrington, 2003; Murray et al., 2009; Piquero et al., 2011; Pogarsky, 2002) and employed one of the most rigorous nonexperimental methodological designs capable of accounting for a wide range of selection effects and confounding…”
MethodLantz, B. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260518786497 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Spruit, A., van der Put, C., Gubbels, J., & Bindels, A. (2017) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.006 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- FARRINGTON, D. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- FARRINGTON, DAVID P.
- ORCID
- FARRINGTON, DAVID P.
- Venue
- Criminology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-225
- ISSN
- 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9125
- OpenAlex
- W1975283997
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 31.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- developmental criminology, life course criminology, criminological theory, theory comparison, offending trajectories, risk factors for offending
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review