Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chemogenetic Analysis of Human Protein Methyltransferases

Open access
Richon, Victoria M., Johnston, Danielle, Sneeringer, Christopher J., Jin, Lei, Majer, Christina R., Elliston, Keith, Jerva, L. Fred, Scott, Margaret Porter, Copeland, Robert A.·2011·Chemical Biology & Drug Design

Abstract

A survey of the human genome was performed to understand the constituency of protein methyltransferases (both protein arginine and lysine methyltransferases) and the relatedness of their catalytic domains. We identified 51 protein lysine methyltransferase proteins based on similarity to the canonical Drosophila Su(var)3‐9, enhancer of zeste (E(z)), and trithorax (trx) domain. Disruptor of telomeric silencing‐1‐like, a known protein lysine methyltransferase, did not fit within the protein lysine methyltransferase family, but did group with the protein arginine methyltransferases, along with 44 other proteins, including the METTL and NOP2/Sun domain family proteins. We show that a representative METTL, METTL11A, demonstrates catalytic activity as a histone methyltransferase. We also solved the co‐crystal structures of disruptor of telomeric silencing‐1‐like with S‐adenosylmethionine and S‐adenosylhomocysteine bound in its active site. The conformation of both ligands is virtually identical to that found in known protein arginine methyltransferases, METTL and NOP2/Sun domain family proteins and is distinct from that seen in the Drosophila Su(var)3‐9, enhancer of zeste (E(z)), and trithorax (trx) domain protein lysine methyltransferases. We have developed biochemical assays for 11 members of the protein methyltransferase target class and have profiled the affinity of three ligands for these enzymes: the common methyl‐donating substrate S‐adenosylmethionine; the common reaction product S‐adenosylhomocysteine; and the natural product sinefungin. The affinity of each of these ligands is mapped onto the family trees of the protein lysine methyltransferases and protein arginine methyltransferases to reveal patterns of ligand recognition by these enzymes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01135.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Richon, V. M., Johnston, D., Sneeringer, C. J., Jin, L., Majer, C. R., Elliston, K., Jerva, L. F., Scott, M. P., & Copeland, R. A.
Venue
Chemical Biology & Drug Design
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-16
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
199-210
ISSN
  • 1747-0277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0285
OpenAlex
W2165905267
Cited by
188
References
4
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemogenetic Analysis of Human Protein Methyltransferases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01135.x
The paper
Richon, V. M., Johnston, D., Sneeringer, C. J., Jin, L., Majer, C. R., Elliston, K., Jerva, L. F., Scott, M. P., & Copeland, R. A. (2011). Chemogenetic Analysis of Human Protein Methyltransferases. Chemical Biology & Drug Design. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01135.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.