The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Instrumental Value of Explanations
Abstract
Scientific and ‘intuitive’ or ‘folk’ theories are typically characterized as serving three critical functions: prediction, explanation, and control. While prediction and control have clear instrumental value, the value of explanation is less transparent. This paper reviews an emerging body of research from the cognitive sciences suggesting that the process of seeking, generating, and evaluating explanations in fact contributes to future prediction and control, albeit indirectly by facilitating the discovery and confirmation of instrumentally valuable theories. Theoretical and empirical considerations also suggest why explanations may nonetheless feel intrinsically valuable. The paper concludes by considering some implications of the psychology of explanation for a naturalized philosophy of explanation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Philosophical and empirical research has converged on the thesis that we are particularly interested in causal explanations because they provide us with reliable means to affect and predict our surroundings”
From AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomy (2022) · cites this paper as Lombrozo, 2011
Citations
Cites
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
Fraassen, B. C. V. (1980) · doi:10.1093/0198244274.001.0001 · Cited by 4,682
Conceptual Change in Childhood
Carey, S. E. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,851
Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: 1955
Feshbach, S., & Jones, M. R. (1957) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419253 · Cited by 3,842
(1967) · Cited by 3,831
Demopoulos, W., & van Fraassen, B. C. (1982) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184804 · Cited by 3,321
Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392759 · Cited by 3,179
Studies in the Logic of Explanation
Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/286983 · Cited by 3,174
Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding
Michelene, T. H., Leeuw, N. D., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7 · Cited by 2,492
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Craik K, 1943, The Nature of Explanations
- 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.499 · DOI · Paper page
- Lagnado D.The Psychology of Explanation: A Bayesian Approach.’Masters Thesis Schools of Psychology and Computer Science University of Birmingham 1994.
- Woodward J, 2010, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Langer, M., Oster, D., Speith, T., Hermanns, H., Kästner, L., Schmidt, E., Sesing, A., & Baum, K. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103473 · Cited by 652
Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems
Ehsan, U., Liao, Q. V., Muller, M., Riedl, M. O., & Weisz, J. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445188 · Cited by 538
Transparency in Algorithmic and Human Decision-Making: Is There a Double Standard?
Zerilli, J., Knott, A., Maclaurin, J., & Gavaghan, C. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0330-6 · Cited by 420
Langer, M., & Landers, R. N. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106878 · Cited by 338
Explanatory Preferences Shape Learning and Inference
Lombrozo, T. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.001 · Cited by 229
Self-citationWoodward, J. (2007) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197585412.001.0001 · Cited by 206
Evaluating everyday explanations
Zemla, J. C., Sloman, S. A., Bechlivanidis, C., & Lagnado, D. A. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1258-z · Cited by 133
The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI Explanations
Ehsan, U., Passi, S., Liao, Q. V., Chan, L., Lee, I.-H., Muller, M., & Riedl, M. O. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642474 · Cited by 123
AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomy
Vaassen, B. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00577-5 · Cited by 94
Public attitudes value interpretability but prioritize accuracy in Artificial Intelligence
Nußberger, A.-M., Luo, L., Celis, L. E., & Crockett, M. J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33417-3 · Cited by 105
Charting the Sociotechnical Gap in Explainable AI: A Framework to Address the Gap in XAI
Ehsan, U., Saha, K., Choudhury, M. D., & Riedl, M. O. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579467 · Cited by 113
Explanation and Explanationism in Science and Metaphysics
Saatsi, J. T. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199363209.003.0009 · Cited by 66
Source credibility and the processing of refutation texts
Boekel, M. V., Lassonde, K. A., O’Brien, E. J., & Kendeou, P. (2016) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0649-0 · Cited by 59
The metaphor police: A case study of the role of metaphor in explanation
Thibodeau, P. H., Crow, L., & Flusberg, S. J. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1192-5 · Cited by 57
The heuristic conception of inference to the best explanation
Dellsén, F. (2017) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-017-0933-2 · Cited by 52
Chernyak, N., Kang, C., & Kushnir, T. (2019) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000670 · Cited by 52
Bayesian Occam's Razor Is a Razor of the People
Blanchard, T., Lombrozo, T., & Nichols, S. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12573 · Cited by 48
Self-citationShared understanding of color among sighted and blind adults
Kim, J. S., Aheimer, B., Manrara, V. M., & Bedny, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2020192118 · Cited by 48
Optimizing Conditions for Learning: Situating Refutations in Epistemic Cognition
Kendeou, P., Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2015) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2015.1027806 · Cited by 43
“Learning by Thinking” in Science and in Everyday Life
Lombrozo, T. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190212308.003.0010 · Cited by 38
Self-citationRelative explainability and double standards in medical decision-making
Kempt, H., Heilinger, J., & Nagel, S. K. (2022) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-022-09646-x · Cited by 38
Children’s success at detecting circular explanations and their interest in future learning
Mills, C. M., Danovitch, J. H., Rowles, S. P., & Chandler-Campbell, I. L. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1195-2 · Cited by 40
Mind the gap: How incomplete explanations influence children’s interest and learning behaviors
Danovitch, J. H., Mills, C. M., Sands, K. R., & Williams, A. J. (2021) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101421 · Cited by 28
Data science and molecular biology: prediction and mechanistic explanation
López‐Rubio, E., & Ratti, E. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02271-0 · Cited by 34
Stability, breadth and guidance
Blanchard, T., Vasilyeva, N. Y., & Lombrozo, T. (2017) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-017-0958-6 · Cited by 26
Self-citationDeterminants of Judgments of Explanatory Power: Credibility, Generality, and Statistical Relevance
Colombo, M., Bucher, L., & Sprenger, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01430 · Cited by 25
How Are Biology Concepts Used and Transformed?
Brigandt, I. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.006 · Cited by 24
The Automated Laplacean Demon: How ML Challenges Our Views on Prediction and Explanation
Srećković, S., Berber, A., & Filipović, N. (2021) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09575-6 · Cited by 22
Experimental Philosophy of Explanation Rising: The Case for a Plurality of Concepts of Explanation
Colombo, M. (2016) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12340 · Cited by 22
Representing, Running, and Revising Mental Models: A Computational Model
Friedman, S., Forbus, K. D., & Sherin, B. L. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12574 · Cited by 21
Is It Possible to Scientifically Reconstruct the History of Life on Earth?
Cleland, C. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.011 · Cited by 20
Wittwer, J., & Ihme, N. (2013) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2013.855577 · Cited by 19
Contrastive Constraints Guide Explanation‐Based Category Learning
Chin‐Parker, S., & Cantelon, J. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12405 · Cited by 18
Best-System Laws, Explanation, and Unification
Blanchard, T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192893819.003.0011 · Cited by 17
Metaphor and Scientific Explanation
Levy, A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190212308.003.0013 · Cited by 17
The Who in Explainable AI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI ExplanationsPreprint
Ehsan, U., Passi, S., Liao, Q. V., Chan, L., Lee, I.-H., Muller, M. J., & Riedl, M. O. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 17
Philosophy of Science for Biologists
Kampourakis, K., & Uller, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981 · Cited by 17
Functions and Cognitive Bases for the Concept of Actual Causation
Danks, D. J. (2013) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-013-9439-2 · Cited by 16
The State of Tourism Futures Research
Yeoman, I. S., & Beeton, S. (2014) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287514551054 · Cited by 16
A contrastive account of explanation generation
Chin-Parker, S., & Bradner, A. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1349-x · Cited by 15
Nullius in Explanans: an ethical risk assessment for explainable AI
Nannini, L., Huyskes, D., Panai, E., Pistilli, G., & Tartaro, A. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09800-7 · Cited by 16
Modeling the Process by Which People Try to Explain Complex Things to Others
Klein, G. L., Hoffman, R. R., Mueller, S. T., & Newsome, E. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/15553434211045154 · Cited by 14
What Constitutes an Explanation in Biology?
Potochnik, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.003 · Cited by 13
Aronowitz, S., & Lombrozo, T. (2019) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12445 · Cited by 12
Self-citationDeep learning models and the limits of explainable artificial intelligence
Bjerring, J. C., Mainz, J. T., & Munch, L. A. (2025) · Asian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s44204-024-00238-8 · Cited by 16
Iterative and Adaptive Sampling with Spatial Attention for Black-Box Model Explanations
Vasu, B., & Long, C. (2020) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv45572.2020.9093576 · Cited by 11
Tomaino, G., Abdulhalim, H., Kireyev, P., & Wertenbroch, K. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3683754 · Cited by 12
No brute facts: The Principle of Sufficient Reason in ordinary thought
Partington, S. W., Vesga, A., & Nichols, S. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105479 · Cited by 10
Fasce, A. (2022) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.8051 · Cited by 10
Vaupotič, N., Kienhues, D., & Jucks, R. (2022) · The Educational and Developmental Psychologist · doi:10.1080/20590776.2021.2018916 · Cited by 10
Meaningful transparency through data rights: A multidimensional analysis
Naudts, L., Dewitte, P., & Ausloos, J. (2022) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781800371682.00030 · Cited by 8
Family science capital moderates gender differences in parent–child scientific conversation
Leech, K. A. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106020 · Cited by 8
Masón, L., Borella, E., Diakidoy, I. N., Butterfuss, R., Kendeou, P., & Carretti, B. (2020) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2020.1826248 · Cited by 8
Expressivism about explanatory relevance
Hunt, J. (2022) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-022-01890-7 · Cited by 7
Ambient Explanations: Ambient Intelligence and Explainable AI
Cassens, J., & Wegener, R. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34255-5_30 · Cited by 7
Why Does It Matter That Many Biology Concepts Are Metaphors?
Kampourakis, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.007 · Cited by 7
How does Google get its information?: Children's judgements about Google search
Girouard‐Hallam, L. N., & Danovitch, J. H. (2024) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12487 · Cited by 6
FOLK ATTRIBUTIONS OF UNDERSTANDING: IS THERE A ROLE FOR EPISTEMIC LUCK?
Wilkenfeld, D. A., Plunkett, D., & Lombrozo, T. (2016) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2016.38 · Cited by 6
Self-citationRevisiting the narrow latent scope bias in explanatory reasoning
Stephan, S. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105630 · Cited by 5
What Is the Nature of Scientific Controversies in the Biological Sciences?
Dietrich, M. R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.013 · Cited by 6
Ihme, N., & Wittwer, J. (2015) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9349-6 · Cited by 5
Disciplining Deliberation: A Socio-technical Perspective on Machine Learning Trade-Offs
Fazelpour, S. (2025) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/734552 · Cited by 5
Korosec-Serfaty, M., Léger, P., Parent‐Rocheleau, X., & Sénécal, S. (2026) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-025-10691-2 · Cited by 4
Horne, Z., Kobaş, M., & Cimpian, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2424725122 · Cited by 4
Eight Other Questions about Explanation
Potochnik, A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198777946.003.0004 · Cited by 4
What Is the Relation between Facts and Values in Biological Science?
Friese, C., & Prainsack, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.014 · Cited by 5
Do mathematical explanations have instrumental value?
Morris, R. L. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02114-y · Cited by 3
But Why?: Children’s belief in the necessity of explanations
Flanagan, T., Vesga, A., Kushnir, T., & Nichols, S. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106317 · Cited by 3
Seeking Ideal Explanations in a Non-Ideal World.
Kon, E., & Lombrozo, T. (2018) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 3
Self-citationExplainable Inference in the FRANK Query Answering System
Nuamah, K., & Bundy, A. (2020) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia200376 · Cited by 3
How Can Conceptual Analysis Contribute to Scientific Practice?
Lewens, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.009 · Cited by 3
What Is the Nature of Theories and Models in Biology?
Parke, E. C., & Plutynski, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.005 · Cited by 3
Comparing Gender Hierarchy and Evolutionary Psychology Explanations of Workplace Sexual Harassment
Weaving, M., Lynch, K. E., & Fine, C. (2026) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-026-10575-w · Cited by 2
What Is the Basis of Biological Classification?
Reydon, T. A. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.012 · Cited by 2
What’s the Point of Understanding?
Hannon, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190914721.003.0010 · Cited by 2
How Do Concepts Contribute to Scientific Advancement?
Depew, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.008 · Cited by 2
A Philosopher in the Age of Creationism
Ruse, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.015 · Cited by 2
McCain, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.004 · Cited by 3
Explanatory Judgment, Probability, and Abductive InferencePreprint
Colombo, M., Postma, M., & Sprenger, J. (2016) · PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 2
Lombrozo, T. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118661666.ch34 · Cited by 2
Self-citationTrouche, E. (2016) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e8ec0fb8za022z4ef1za466z61b89b7d0b0c · Cited by 2
New Horizons in Studying the Cellular Mechanisms of Alzheimer’s Disease
Ehsani, S. (2022) · Future of business and finance · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99838-7_4 · Cited by 1
Determinants of judgments of explanatory power: Credibility, Generalizability, and Causal Framing
Colombo, M., Bucher, L., & Sprenger, J. (2017) · Research portal (Tilburg University) · Cited by 1
Children selectively endorse speculative conjectures
Chu, J., & Schulz, L. (2021) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13647 · Cited by 2
Why Should Biologists Care about the Philosophy of Science?
Uller, T., & Kampourakis, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.002 · Cited by 1
What Methods Do Life Scientists Use?
Peterson, E. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.010 · Cited by 1
Combining Deductive and Statistical Explanations in the FRANK Query Answering System
Bundy, A., & Nuamah, K. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK) · doi:10.1109/ickg52313.2021.00010 · Cited by 1
Woodward, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197585412.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Gradient Frequency Modulation for Visually Explaining Video Understanding Models
Lin, X., Bao, W., Wright, M., & Kong, Y. (2021) · British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) · doi:10.5244/c.35.15 · Cited by 1
Explanatory Value and Probabilistic ReasoningPreprint
Colombo, M., Bucher, L., Postma, M., & Sprenger, J. (2014) · PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 1
The Subsumptive Constraints Account of why explaining "why?" helps learning
Williams, J. J. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Mitigating the trade-off between verification and speculation in learning vowel harmonyPreprint
Do, Y., Hoey, T. V., & Yu, B. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/x9fct · Cited by 1
Birth-Related Brain Injuries: Torts in TroublePreprint
Giard, R. W. M. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2215103
Explanatory Value and Probabilistic Reasoning: An Empirical StudyPreprint
Colombo, M., Postma, M., & Sprenger, J. (2014) · PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)
How Can We Teach Philosophy of Science to Biologists?
Kampourakis, K., & Uller, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.016
Principled Mechanistic Explanations in Biology: A Case Study of Alzheimer's DiseasePreprint
Ehsani, S. (2021) · PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)
Some Empirical Results Concerning Causal Learning and Representation
Woodward, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197585412.003.0005
Woodward, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197585412.003.0006
Metadata
- Authors
- Lombrozo, T.
- Affiliations
- University of California System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lombrozo, Tania
- ORCID
- Lombrozo, Tania
- Venue
- Philosophy Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 539-551
- ISSN
- 1747-9991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1903964690
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 14.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophy Compass (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Keywords
- explanation, prediction, control, folk theories, scientific theories, cognitive science, theory evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review