Cited by 34Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Transferring from an acute hospital and settling into a subacute facility: the experience of patients with dementia

Digby, Robin, Moss, Cheryle, Bloomer, Melissa·2012·International Journal of Older People Nursing

Abstract

digby R., moss c. & bloomer m. (2012) Transferring from an acute hospital and settling into a subacute facility: the experience of patients with dementia. International Journal of Older People Nursing7, 57–64 doi: 10.1111/j.1748‐3743.2011.00282.x Background. In a Melbourne metropolitan health network, patients with dementia can have difficulty settling into a subacute rehabilitation facility after transfer from the acute hospital. Aims and objectives. To understand how older patients with mild to moderate dementia experienced the transfer from acute to subacute care and settling‐in period. Design. A descriptive design was used. Eight patients with mild to moderate dementia were recruited, one to 5 days after transfer. Method. A qualitative method using in‐depth interviews was used. The data were analysed using content analysis. Results. Four main themes were identified: ‘Settling into a new environment’, ‘staff attitudes to people with dementia’, ‘loss of control’ and ‘family support’. Conclusions. Person‐centred care that comes from the perspective of respect for the individual transcends all these issues. People with dementia require more support to settle after transfer. Family involvement can assist in facilitating a smooth transition. Implications for practice. Nurses who understand the specific needs of patients with dementia can develop ways of working with patients to ensure person‐centred care. More conversations with people with dementia are needed to investigate how this can be achieved. Orientation procedures should ensure that support for people with dementia is optimized during the settling‐in phase.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2011.00282.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Digby, R., Moss, C., & Bloomer, M.
Affiliations
Peninsula Health (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Older People Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-27
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
57-64
ISSN
  • 1748-3735 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3743
OpenAlex
W1955989363
Cited by
34
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Older People Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
dementia, hospital discharge, subacute rehabilitation, care transitions, person-centred care, employee attitudes, loss of control, family support, elderly patients, nursing care
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Attitude of Health Personnel, Confusion, Dementia, Female, Geriatric Nursing, Hospitals, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Nursing Staff, Patient Transfer, Rehabilitation Centers, Social Support, Patient-Centered Care, Rehabilitation Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review