Cited by 13Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

"Seeing the day-to-day situation": A grounded theory of how persons living with dementia and their family caregivers experience the hospital to home transition and beyond

Saragosa, Marianne, Kuluski, Kerry, Okrainec, Karen, Jeffs, Lianne·2023·Journal of Aging Studies

Abstract

Most older adults with dementia live at home, they primarily receive care provided by family members and friends. Given the decline in memory and other cognitive functions, there to be higher rates of touch points with the health system for those living with dementia. Evidence has shown that these care transitions mark critical changes in the lives of older people, including significant and far-reaching changes to family caregivers. Therefore, it is imperative that complex social processes enacted by persons with dementia and their family caregivers in response to care transitions be more thoroughly explained. This study took place in Canada between 2019 and 2021 and adopted a constructivist grounded theory design. Twenty-five people participated in 20 interviews: 4 people living with dementia and 21 caregivers. We report on six concepts grounded in the data that are linked to a core process engaged in by the participants throughout the care transition journey and beyond: Seeing the day-to-day situation. This study contributes theoretically to the care transition literature by making explicit not only the visible work done by patient-caregiver days during the care transition journey, but it has also illuminated the ongoing processes engaged in by caregivers who are navigating the health and social care systems with their family member living with dementia. During the care transition, and beyond, the caregiver is forced to take over and connect the dots. Even though the caring experience is fraught with traumatic and very challenging situations, for many caregivers, they rise above and can reconcile their suffering with a desire to help their family member and others who may be going through similar experiences. This theory provides a foundation on which to develop theory-driven interventions that focus on support the patient-caregiver dyad during care transitions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101132

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saragosa, M., Kuluski, K., Okrainec, K., & Jeffs, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Saragosa, Marianne
Venue
Journal of Aging Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
65
Pages
101132
ISSN
0890-4065 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4360603262
Cited by
13
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Aging Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (RN447323 - 460820)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dementia, family caregivers, hospital-to-home transition, care transitions, patient-caregiver dyads, caregiver experiences, older adults, health and social care systems, caregiver burden, theory-based intervention
MeSH terms
Hospital to Home Transition, Aged, Dementia, Family, Humans, Caregivers, Grounded Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review