Cited by 25Helminth infection and controlParasitic infections in humans and animalsParasitic Infections and Diagnostics

Risk factors for endoparasitism in dogs: retrospective case–control study of 6578 veterinary teaching hospital cases

Open access
Gates, M. C., Nolan, T. J.·2009·Journal of Small Animal Practice

Abstract

O bjectives:The diagnostic utility of routine faecal examinations can be greatly enhanced through an appreciation of risk factors most commonly associated with endoparasitism. M ethods:From a sample of 6578 canine patients presenting to a veterinary teaching hospital between 1996 and 2006, this study used univariate and multi‐variable techniques to examine putative signalment, medical history and demographic factors predisposing dogs to intestinal parasites. R esults:Age and median household income were the strongest predictors of endoparasitism. The odds of a patient being diagnosed with endoparasites were 0·82 times smaller for every 1 year increase in age (OR=0·82, 95% CI: 0·80 to 0·84) and for every $10,000 increase in median household income, the odds were 0·86 times lower (OR=0·86, 95% CI: 0·83 to 0·89). The variables gender, neuter status, month of diagnosis, admitting clinical service and primary diagnosis were not significant predictors. Animals that were presented for underlying medical conditions were less likely to have parasites and the presence of diarrhoea was associated with 76% lower odds of endoparasitism compared to healthy animals (OR=0·76, 95% CI: 0·64 to 0·90). C linical S ignificance:Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for parasites in younger patients that live in high population density and low income neighbourhoods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2009.00814.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No significant differences in nematode infection in symptomatic dogs, compared with animals without clinical signs has been found.

    “no significant differences in nematode infection in symptomatic dogs, compared with animals without clinical signs has been found [49,53,192]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gates, M. C., & Nolan, T. J.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Nolan, T. J.
Venue
Journal of Small Animal Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
636-640
ISSN
  • 0022-4510 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-5827
OpenAlex
W2099889200
Cited by
25
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Small Animal Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 07065, T35RR007065)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Keywords
intestinal parasites, dogs, risk factors, fecal analysis, household income, age, diarrhea, signalment, population density
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Feces, Female, Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic, Male, Parasitic Diseases, Animal, Pennsylvania, Population Density, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review