The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Edible insects: Traditional knowledge or western phobia?
Open accessAbstract
With an increasing human population and environmental degradation, the world faces a major problem in providing adequate animal based proteins. Many traditional societies have used or still use insects as a protein source, while westernized societies are reluctant to use insects, despite being the major consumers of animal proteins. We now need to consider insects as a source of food for humans in a manner that acknowledges both the role of entomophagy in indigenous societies and the need for westernized societies to reduce the size of their environmental footprint with regard to food production. The situation on continents such as Africa, Asia, and Central and South America has some parallels to Australia in that there are two forces in operation: the sustainable traditional use of edible insects and the “westernization” of these societies leading to a movement away from entomophagy. However, the potential to reach a compromise is greater in these continents because entomophagy is already accepted. The major challenges will be establishing sustainable production systems that include food safety and security as well as environmental protection. Whether this will happen or not will depend upon: (i) a major change in attitude in westernized societies towards entomophagy; (ii) pressure to conserve remaining habitats in a sustainable manner; (iii) economic impetus to develop food production systems that include insects; and (iv) an acknowledgement that achieving adequate nutrition on a global basis will involve different diets in much of the developed world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Holliday, J. C., & Cleaver, M. P. (2008) · International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms · doi:10.1615/intjmedmushr.v10.i3.30 · Cited by 204
Nutritional composition of some wild plant foods and honey used by Hadza foragers of Tanzania.
Murray, S. S., Schoeninger, M. J., Bunn, H. T., Pickering, T. R., & Marlett, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1006/jfca.2000.0960 · Cited by 190
Cited by
Review of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) as animal feed and human food.
Wang, Y.-S., & Shelomi, M. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6100091 · Cited by 812
Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance
Tan, H. S. G., Fischer, A. R. H., Tinchan, P., Stieger, M., Steenbekkers, L. P. A., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013 · Cited by 500
Edible Insects Acceptance by Belgian Consumers: Promising Attitude for Entomophagy Development
Caparros Megido, R., Sablon, L., Geuens, M., Brostaux, Y., Alabi, T., Blecker, C., Drugmand, D., Haubruge, É., & Francis, F. (2014) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/joss.12077 · Cited by 371
Edible insects are the future?
van Huis, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665116000069 · Cited by 363
Edible insects as future food: chances and challenges
Lange, K. W., & Nakamura, Y. (2021) · Journal of Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jfutfo.2021.10.001 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- YEN, A. L.
- Venue
- Entomological Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 289-298
- ISSN
- 1738-2297 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-5967
- OpenAlex
- W2010796088
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Edible insects: Traditional knowledge or western phobia? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1748-5967.2009.00239.x
- The paper
- YEN, A. L. (2009). Edible insects: Traditional knowledge or western phobia? Entomological Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5967.2009.00239.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.