Edible Insects Acceptance by B elgian Consumers: Promising Attitude for Entomophagy Development
Abstract
Abstract Entomophagy is not well accepted in W estern E uropean populations but it is common in the world. In the future, populations from developed countries should adapt to other sources of animal proteins because traditional breeding of beef, poultry or pork will become unsustainable. This study was performed to assess the perception of entomophagy in the B elgian population. A slight neophobia was detected but people agreed to evaluate insect preparations. Various insect formulations (mealworms and house crickets) were prepared, and insects associated with known flavors and crispy textures were preferred. After a hedonic test, people seemed to be willing to eat and cook insects in the near future. The opportunity to introduce entomophagy in food habits of W estern E uropean populations was positively concluded. Integration of edible insects in human food is a potential solution to replace other animal protein sources in a much more sustainable development and will deserve more attention in the future. Practical Applications This study shows the edible insects' potential to become a usual food ingredient in W estern E uropean populations. Our results show that consumers are ready to buy and cook insects at home if they are able to associate them with familiar flavors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cultural background and individual experiences play an important role on consumers' acceptance of insect-based food.
“The main findings reveal that cultural background and individual experiences play an important role on consumers acceptance”
From Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry (2018) · cites this paper as Caparros Megido et al., 2014
Cites
Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w · Cited by 2,137 · see citing works
Szczesniak, A. S. (2002) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(01)00039-8 · Cited by 1,664 · see citing works
Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 · Cited by 1,632 · see citing works
Oonincx, D. G. A. B., Itterbeeck, J. V., Heetkamp, M. J. W., van den Brand, H., van Loon, J. J. A., & van Huis, A. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014445 · Cited by 861 · see citing works
Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods
Tuorila, H., Lähteenmäki, L., Pohjalainen, L., & Lotti, L. (2001) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(00)00025-2 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Schösler, H., de Boer, J., & Boersema, J. J. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.009 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Values and Perceptions of Invertebrates
Kellert, S. R. (1993) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740845.x · Cited by 557 · see citing works
INSECTS AS FOOD: Why the Western Attitude Is Important
DeFoliart, G. R. (1999) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.21 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Lee, L., Frederick, S., & Ariely, D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01829.x · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Anthropo‐entomophagy: Cultures, evolution and sustainability
Ramos‐Elorduy, J. (2009) · Entomological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1748-5967.2009.00238.x · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., McCauley, C. R., Dunlop, L. R., & Ashmore, M. (1999) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2251 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
DeFoliart, G. R. (1992) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/0261-2194(92)90020-6 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Tuorila, H., Meiselman, H. L., Bell, R., Cardello, A. V., & Johnson, W. F. (1994) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1994.1056 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Reduction of Neophobia in Humans by Exposure to Novel Foods
Pliner, P. P., Pelchat, M. L., & Grabski, M. (1993) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1993.1013 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Edible insects: Traditional knowledge or western phobia?
Yen, A. L. (2009) · Entomological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1748-5967.2009.00239.x · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Premalatha, M., Abbasi, T., Abbasi, T., & Abbasi, S. A. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.115 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Pliner, P. P., & Salvy, S. (2006) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851990323.0075 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Falguera, V., Gallart, N. A. I., & Pascual, M. F. (2012) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.01.051 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Hursti, U. K., & Sjödén, P. (1997) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1997.0108 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
“Try it. You'll like it”. Effects of information on willingness to try novel foods
Pelchat, M. L., & Pliner, P. P. (1995) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(95)99373-8 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Nakagaki, B. J., & DeFoliart, G. R. (1991) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/84.3.891 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Insects: A sustainable source of food?
Ramos‐Elorduy, J. (1997) · Ecology of Food and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/03670244.1997.9991519 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
The acquisition of taste aversions in humans
Logue, A. W., Ophir, I., & Strauss, K. E. (1981) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(81)90053-x · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Increasing Willingness to Taste Novel Foods: Effects of Nutrition and Taste Information
McFarlane, T., & Pliner, P. P. (1997) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1996.0075 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
More than preparing a meal? Concerning the meanings of home cooking
Daniels, S., Glorieux, I., Minnen, J., & van Tienoven, T. P. (2012) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2012.02.040 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Consumers of organic foods – value segments and liking of bread
Kihlberg, I., & Risvik, E. (2006) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.03.023 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Attitudes Toward Invertebrates: Are Educational "Bug Banquets" Effective?
Looy, H., & Wood, J. R. (2006) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.3200/joee.37.2.37-48 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Changes in liking for a no added salt soup as a function of exposure
Methven, L., Langreney, E., & Prescott, J. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.04.012 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Socio-technical innovation for sustainable food chains: roles for social science
Lowe, P. D., Phillipson, J., & Lee, R. P. (2007) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2007.11.005 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
You can teach an old dog new tricks: olfaction and responses to novel foods by the elderly
Pelchat, M. L. (2000) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.2000.0348 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Food neophobia and the adoption of new food products
Johns, N., Edwards, J. S., & Hartwell, H. J. (2011) · Nutrition & Food Science · doi:10.1108/00346651111132475 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Thomas, T. G. S., & Günden, C. (2012) · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Food Security: Farming Insects
Sileshi, G. W., & Kenis, M. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.328.5978.568-a · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from hydrolyzed cowpea flour
Guang, C., & Phillips, R. D. (2012) · Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society
Verbeke, W. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance
Tan, H. S. G., Fischer, A. R. H., Tinchan, P., Stieger, M., Steenbekkers, L. P. A., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry
Santeramo, F. G., Carlucci, D., De Devitiis, B., Seccia, A., Stasi, A., Viscecchia, R., & Nardone, G. (2018) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.039 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
- Authors
- Caparros Megido, R., Sablon, L., Geuens, M., Brostaux, Y., Alabi, T., Blecker, C., Drugmand, D., Haubruge, É., & Francis, F.
- Affiliations
- Entomologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive Gembloux Agro‐Bio Tech Université de Liège Passage des déportés, 2 Gembloux 5030 Belgique
- University of Liège (BE)
- Insectarium Jean Leclercq – Hexapoda Waremme Belgique
- Venue
- Journal of Sensory Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-12-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-20
- ISSN
- 0887-8250 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-459X
- OpenAlex
- W2116142018
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 14.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sensory Studies (publishedVersion)
- ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Keywords
- entomophagy, edible insects, consumer acceptance, Belgian consumers, neophobia, mealworms, Acheta domesticus, hedonic test, alternative animal protein, sustainable food
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
