The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring alternative relationships between perceived investment in employee development, perceived supervisor support and employee outcomes
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore alternative relationships between perceived investment in employee development (PIED), perceived supervisor support (PSS), and employee outcomes in the form of attitudes (affective commitment and turnover intention) and work performance (work effort, work quality and organisational citizenship behaviour). A cross‐sectional survey among 331 employees from a Norwegian telecommunications organisation showed that the relationship between PSS and employee attitudes was partially mediated by PIED. In addition, PSS was found to moderate the relationship between PIED and three self‐report measures of work performance. The form of the moderation revealed a positive relationship only for high levels of PSS. These findings suggest that line managers are of vital importance in implementing developmental HR practices, either because they influence how such practices are perceived by employees, which, in turn, affects employee attitudes, or because positive experiences with both line managers and HR practices seem to be needed in order for developmental HR practices to positively influence employee performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305279602 · Cited by 10,068
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023 · cited 2×
“Organisational support theory and social exchange theory suggest that employees who perceive a high level of organisational support (POS) will feel an obligation to repay the organisation through positive attitudes and appropriate behaviours (Eisenberger et al., 1990; Coyle-Shapiro and Conway, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodHUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS[1]
Guest, D. E. (1987) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00460.x · Cited by 1,353
Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269 · Cited by 1,210
Creating value for employees: investment in employee development
Lee, C. H., & Bruvold, N. T. (2003) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/0958519032000106173 · Cited by 632
Kuvaas, B. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.377 · Cited by 422
Self-citationTrust, Individualism and job characteristics as predictors of employee preference for teamwork
Kiffin-Petersen, S., & Cordery, J. (2003) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190210158538 · Cited by 198
Cited by
Alfes, K., Shantz, A. D., Truss, C., & Soane, E. C. (2013) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.679950 · Cited by 770
Keegan, A., & Den Hartog, D. (2019) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12216 · Cited by 47
Ali, Z., & Mehreen, A. (2019) · Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship · doi:10.1108/ebhrm-11-2018-0069 · Cited by 19
Transformational Leadership and Innovation for Competitive Advantage in Large Firms and SMEs
Ashoor, W. A. (2021) · International Journal of R&D Innovation Strategy · doi:10.4018/ijrdis.20210101.oa2 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuvaas, B., & Dysvik, A.
- Venue
- Human Resource Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03-26
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 138-156
- ISSN
- 0954-5395 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-8583
- OpenAlex
- W1984709658
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 10.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
