Cited by 268Employer Branding and e-HRMHuman Resource and Talent ManagementAI and HR Technologies

Desired goals and actual outcomes of e-HRM: e-HRM goals and outcomes

Parry, Emma, Tyson, Shaun·2011·Human Resource Management Journal

Abstract

Much discussion exists in the academic literature about the potential goals of e-HRM, but few scholars have looked at whether these goals are actually realised and what factors have an impact on this. This study examined the goals stated by organisations for the introduction of e-HRM, whether these goals were actually achieved, and the factors affecting this through ten case studies in a range of UK organisations. The results demonstrated that e-HRM is introduced in order to improve efficiency, service delivery, standardisation and organisational image, to empower managers and transform HR into a more strategic function. Efficiency, service delivery and standardisation goals were commonly realised. Some evidence of a transformational impact of e-HRM was found, as the HR staff had more time and information to support the organisation in achieving its business strategy. However, no evidence was found of an actual increased involvement of HR in business decision making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00149.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relational consequences emphasise the interactions and networking of different actors in sustaining the relationships with an employee by improving HR services and empowering employees.

    “relational consequences emphasise the interactions and networking of different actors in sustaining the relationships with an employee by improving HR services and empowering employees”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Parry & Tyson, 2011

  • HRM (AI) assimilation will positively influence HR empowerment.

    “Research Proposition 13: HRM (AI) assimilation will positively influence HR empowerment.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Parry & Tyson, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parry, E., & Tyson, S.
Affiliations
Cranfield University (GB)
Corresponding author
Parry, Emma
Venue
Human Resource Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-21
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
335-354
ISSN
0954-5395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135294028
Cited by
268
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Resource Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • CERES (Cranfield University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
Keywords
e-HRM, human resource management systems, goal achievement, efficiency, service delivery, standardization, corporate image, managerial empowerment, strategic human resource management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review