Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,565

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

DISC ELECTROPHORESIS‐I BACKGROUND AND THEORY*

Ornstein, Leonard·1964·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Although electrophoresis is one of the most effective methods for the separation of ionic components of a mixture, the resolving power of different electrophoretic methods is quite variable. To separate two component ions, it is necessary to permit migration to continue until one of the kinds of ions has traveled at least one thickness of the volumes that it initially occupied (the starting zone) further than the other. However, the sharpness, and therefore the resolution, of the zones occupied by each ion diminishes with time because of the spreading of the zones as a result of diffusion. Remarkable resolution has been achieved when advantage is taken of the frictional properties of gels to aid separation by seiving at the molecular level (see Smithies l). A new method, disc electrophoresis, † has been designed that takes advantage of the adjustability of the pore size of a synthetic gel and that automatically produces starting zones of the order of 10 microns thickness from initial volumes with thicknesses of the order of centimeters. High resolution is thus achieved in very brief runs. With this technique, over 20 serum proteins are routinely separated from a sample of whole human serum as small as one microliter in a 20-minute run (see FIGURE 1). Direct analysis of even very dilute samples becomes routine because the various ions are automatically concentrated

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb14207.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ornstein, L.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1964-12
Volume
121
Issue
2
Pages
321-349
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2132068224
Cited by
4,565
References
0
FWCI
138.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.