Cited by 582Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

OPEN‐FIELD BEHAVIOR IN THE RAT: WHAT DOES IT MEAN?*

Denenberg, Victor H.·1969·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb12983.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denenberg, V. H.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Denenberg, Victor H.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1969-07
Volume
159
Issue
3
Pages
852-859
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2127612581
Cited by
582
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
open field behavior, rats, exploratory behavior, anxiety, locomotion
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Corticosterone, Defecation, Emotions, Environment, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Methods, Pregnancy, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review