Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Free Radicals and Hearing: Cause, Consequence, and Criteria

EVANS, PATRICIA, HALLIWELL, BARRY·1999·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, including free radicals, are produced in the human body in both health and disease. In health, they may arise as regulatory mechanisms, intercellular signaling species, or as bacteriocidal agents. Their production is normally controlled by the antioxidant defense mechanisms that include intracellular enzymes‐for example, glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase‐and low molecular‐mass compounds such as vitamin E or ascorbic acid. Although repair mechanisms exist, some steady‐state basal oxidative damage occurs in all individuals. Oxidative stress arises when there is a marked imbalance between the production and removal of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. This may originate from an overproduction of these substances or from a depletion in the antioxidant defenses. Certain drugs may induce oxidative stress by forming drug‐derived radicals that can not only deplete the antioxidant defenses but can also react directly with biomolecules. To be able to assess whether oxidative stress is occurring in a particular tissue, reliable biomarkers of oxidative damage are required. Since oxidative stress can damage all major biomolecules in vitro and probably in vivo, biomarkers for DNA, protein, and lipid damage are being developed which, when taken with an assessment of the antioxidant status of the individual, will allow evaluation of the involvement of oxidative stress in the etiology of disease and in the side effects of drugs. There is some evidence to suggest that free radical‐mediated damage may be involved in the ototoxicity of aminoglycosides and cisplatin derivatives. Whether this is a cause or consequence of the toxic insult to the sensory hair cells of the inner ear remains to be determined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08633.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
EVANS, P., & HALLIWELL, B.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-11
Volume
884
Issue
1
Pages
19-40
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2001435576
Cited by
237
References
9
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Free Radicals and Hearing: Cause, Consequence, and Criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08633.x
The paper
EVANS, P., & HALLIWELL, B. (1999). Free Radicals and Hearing: Cause, Consequence, and Criteria. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08633.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.