Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 419

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Th1 and Th17 cells: Adversaries and collaborators

Open access
Damsker, Jesse M., Hansen, Anna M., Caspi, Rachel R.·2010·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Autoreactive effector CD4+ T cells have been associated with the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders. Early studies implicated the interferon (IFN)‐γ‐producing T helper (Th)1 subset of CD4+ cells as the causal agents in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity. However, further studies have suggested a more complex story. In models thought to be driven by Th1 cells, mice lacking the hallmark Th1 cytokine IFN‐γ were not protected but tended to have enhanced susceptibility to disease. Identification of the IL‐17‐producing CD4+ effector cell lineage (Th17) has helped shed light on this issue. Th17 effector cells are induced in parallel to Th1, and, like Th1, polarized Th17 cells have the capacity to cause inflammation and autoimmune disease. This, together with the finding that deficiency of the Th17‐related cytokine IL‐23 but not the Th1‐related cytokine IL‐12 causes resistance, led to the notion that Th17 cells are the chief contributors to autoimmune tissue inflammation. Nevertheless, mice lacking IL‐17 are not protected from disease and display elevated numbers of IFN‐γ‐producing CD4+ T cells, and, in some cases, lack of IFN‐γ does confer resistance. Recent studies report overlapping as well as differential roles of these cells in tissue inflammation, which suggests the existence of a more complex relationship between these two effector T‐cell subsets than has hitherto been suspected. This review will attempt to bring together current information regarding interaction, balance, and collaborative potential between the Th1 and Th17 effector lineages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05133.x

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Cited by

See all 419

Metadata

Authors
Damsker, J. M., Hansen, A. M., & Caspi, R. R.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01
Volume
1183
Issue
1
Pages
211-221
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2086539844
Cited by
419
References
88
FWCI
11.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Th1 and Th17 cells: Adversaries and collaborators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05133.x
The paper
Damsker, J. M., Hansen, A. M., & Caspi, R. R. (2010). Th1 and Th17 cells: Adversaries and collaborators. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05133.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.