The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human category learning 2.0
Open accessAbstract
During the 1990s and early 2000s, cognitive neuroscience investigations of human category learning focused on the primary goal of showing that humans have multiple category‐learning systems and on the secondary goals of identifying key qualitative properties of each system and of roughly mapping out the neural networks that mediate each system. Many researchers now accept the strength of the evidence supporting multiple systems, and as a result, during the past few years, work has begun on the second generation of research questions—that is, on questions that begin with the assumption that humans have multiple category‐learning systems. This article reviews much of this second generation of research. Topics covered include (1) How do the various systems interact? (2) Are there different neural systems for categorization and category representation? (3) How does automaticity develop in each system? and (4) Exactly how does each system learn?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Savine, A. C., & Braver, T. S. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2052-10.2010 · Cited by 125
Retracted(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
The hippocampus as a cognitive map
Passingham, R. E. (1979) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(79)90015-0 · Cited by 5,128
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation
(2021) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(21)x0002-3 · Cited by 5,027
Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems
Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. F. (2001) · Cited by 3,153
Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition
(2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203728178 · Cited by 2,912
Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.1.39 · Cited by 2,766
Getting formal with dopamine and reward
Schultz, W. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00967-4 · Cited by 2,574
Cited by
Grounding cognitive control in associative learning
Abrahamse, E., Braem, S., Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000047 · Cited by 276
The Neurocognition of Developmental Disorders of Language
Ullman, M. T., Earle, F. S., Walenski, M., & Janacsek, K. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011555 · Cited by 223
The multiple effects of practice: skill, habit and reduced cognitive load
Haith, A. M., & Krakauer, J. W. (2018) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.015 · Cited by 206
Improving executive function using transcranial infrared laser stimulation
Blanco, N. J., Maddox, W. T., & Gonzalez‐Lima, F. (2017) · Journal of Neuropsychology · doi:10.1111/jnp.12074 · Cited by 179
Self-citationToward a dual-learning systems model of speech category learning.
Chandrasekaran, B., Koslov, S. R., & Maddox, W. T. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00825 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-23
- Volume
- 1224
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-161
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W1961118323
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 145
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human category learning 2.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05874.x
- The paper
- Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2011). Human category learning 2.0. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05874.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
