Cited by 22Aquaculture Nutrition and GrowthAquaculture disease management and microbiotaAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Performance of Juvenile Coho Salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch Fed Diets Containing Meals from Fish Wastes, Deboned Fish Wastes, or Skin‐and‐Bone By‐Product as the Protein Ingredient

Rathbone, Cindra K., Babbitt, Jerry K., Dong, Faye M., Hardy, Ronald W.·2001·Journal of the World Aquaculture Society

Abstract

The suitability of meals derived from fish processing wastes as the protein fraction in practical diets for hatchery‐reared coho salmon was investigated. The study compared the performance of coho salmon fed diets containing three products: a skin‐and‐bone meal (SB), a deboned meal (DM), and a whole‐fish meal (WM) made directly from the fish wastes. A commercial trout diet (CO) was fed to a fourth treatment group. Diets were fed at 3% of body weight per day to juvenile coho salmon for 12 wk. Survival (> 94%) was not significantly different among treatment groups. Average fish weight, feed conversion ratio, whole body proximate and mineral composition, and protein and phosphorus retention were compared. There were no significant differences after 12 wk of feeding in fish weight between WM, DM, and CO, but SB had significantly lower weight and whole body lipid, and significantly higher ash. Compared to WM, DM had a significantly lower feed conversion ratio and higher retention of protein and phosphorus, but these indices were not significantly different from CO. It is concluded that DM is a potentially superior protein ingredient compared to WM, while specific characteristics of SB will limit its use as a protein source in feeds for salmonids. However, SB may prove to be a suitable mineral supplement when added at a low level. Utilization of fish processing wastes in salmonid diets could be a commercially viable alternative to direct disposal of processing wastes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2001.tb00918.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rathbone, C. K., Babbitt, J. K., Dong, F. M., & Hardy, R. W.
Affiliations
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
Corresponding author
Babbitt, Jerry K.
Venue
Journal of the World Aquaculture Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-03
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
21-29
ISSN
  • 0893-8849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-7345
OpenAlex
W2160208789
Cited by
22
References
11
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the World Aquaculture Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
coho salmon, fish waste, fish protein source, hatchery-reared juveniles, feed conversion ratio, protein retention, phosphorus retention, fish body composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review