Cited by 192Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Substantial Archaeocortical Atrophy and Neuronal Loss in Multiple Sclerosis

Open access
Papadopoulos, Dimitrios, Dukes, Sumayya, Patel, Ryan, Nicholas, Richard, Vora, Abhilash, Reynolds, Richard·2009·Brain Pathology

Abstract

Recent studies have revealed extensive neocortical pathology in multiple sclerosis (MS). The hippocampus is a unique archaeocortical structure understudied in MS. It plays a central role in episodic and anterograde memory—the most frequently impaired cognitive modalities in MS. This histopathological study aimed to investigate inflammatory demyelination and neurodegenerative changes in the MS archaeocortex. A detailed quantitative analysis was performed on hippocampal autopsy tissue from 45 progressive MS cases and seven controls. Forty‐one lesions were identified in 28 of the 45 hippocampal MS‐blocks examined, with percentage area of demyelination averaging 30.4%. The majority of lesions were chronic and subpially or subependymally located. Compared to controls, neuronal numbers were decreased by 27% in CA1 and 29.7% in CA3‐2. Furthermore, the size of neurones was decreased by 17.4% in CA1. There was evidence of gross hippocampal atrophy with a 22.3% reduction in the average cross‐sectional area, which correlated with neuronal loss. Our study provides evidence of substantial archaeocortical pathology largely resembling patterns seen in the neocortex and suggests that hippocampal involvement could contribute to memory impairments often seen in MS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00177.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In SP-MS, new focal inflammatory demyelinating lesion formation is rare, and the pathological correlate of disability progression is neuroaxonal loss driven by neurodegenerative mechanisms.

    “In the secondary progressive phase of MS (SP-MS) new focal inflammatory demyelinating lesion formation is rare, and the pathological correlate of disability progression is neuroaxonal loss driven by neurodegenerative mechanisms [274,275,276].”

    From Ageing, Cellular Senescence and Neurodegenerative Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [275]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Insausti R, Amaral DG (2003) Hippocampal formation. In: The Human Nervous System, 2nd edn. G Paxinos (ed), pp. 871-914. Academic Press, San Diego.
  2. Lassmann H (2005) Pathology of neurons in multiple sclerosis. In: Multiple Sclerosis as a Neuronal Disease. S Waxman (ed), pp. 153-164. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  3. Morgen K, Sammer G, Courtney SM, Wolters T, Melchior H, Blecker CR et al (2006) Evidence for a direct association between cortical atrophy and cognitive impairment in relapsing-remitting MS. Neuroimage 30:891-898.
  4. Steiner G (1931) Regionale Verteilung der Entmarkungsherde in ihrer Bedeutung für die Pathogenese der multiplen Sclerose. Krankheitserreger und Gewebsbefund bei multipler Sclerose. Springer: Berlin.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papadopoulos, D., Dukes, S., Patel, R., Nicholas, R., Vora, A., & Reynolds, R.
Affiliations
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Papadopoulos, Dimitrios
Venue
Brain Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03-05
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
238-253
ISSN
  • 1015-6305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3639
OpenAlex
W2089858611
Cited by
192
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Parkinson's UK (948776)
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society (747/02, 207495)
  • Imperial College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, hippocampus, hippocampal atrophy, neuronal loss, demyelination, neurodegeneration, memory impairment, CA1, CA3, progressive multiple sclerosis, postmortem brain
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrophy, Demyelinating Diseases, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Meninges, Meningitis, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Neurons, Synapses, Cell Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review