Cited by 18Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchHelminth infection and control

Physiological and haematological findings and clinical observations in a model of acute systemic anaphylaxis in Dirofilaria immitis‐sensitised cats

LITSTER, A., ATWELL, R.·2006·Australian Veterinary Journal

Abstract

Objective This study aims to understand the pathophysiology of anaphylaxis in Dirofilaria immitis‐sensitised cats by analysing objective physiological and haematological measurements after challenge. Design Nineteen healthy D immitis‐ naïve cats were sensitised using weekly injections of aluminium hydroxide‐adjuvanted D immitis antigen, administered subcutaneously over 6 weeks. After sensitisation, cats (n = 16) were anaesthetised and challenged with intravenous D immitis antigen. A control group (n = 3) was sham‐challenged using intravenous sterile 0.9% saline. Systolic blood pressure (measured non‐invasively/indirectly), respiratory rate, degree of dyspnoea, blood O 2 saturation, expired CO 2, and heart rate and were measured immediately before and at 10 to 15 min intervals after challenge until terminal apnoea occurred or euthanasia at 140 mins post‐challenge. Blood was collected for complete blood count immediately before and at 10, 20 and 35 mins after challenge. Clinical observations were recorded as they occurred. Results Antigen‐challenged cats were divided into two groups: acute (apnoea occurred within 25 mins of challenge) and subacute (breathing at 25 mins after challenge). In both groups, the degree of dyspnoea increased and blood O 2 saturation and blood pressure decreased. Respiratory rate increased in the subacute group. Expired CO 2 decreased in both Ag‐challenged and control groups. Haematocrit increased in the subacute group. Neutrophil count decreased in the acute group and platelet count decreased in the subacute group. Eosinophil count decreased in the subacute and control groups. Sustained dyspnoea and gastrointestinal signs were the most common clinical manifestations of anaphylaxis in the antigen‐challenged cats. Conclusions Intravenous challenge with D immitis antigen in sensitised cats results in dyspnoea, hypoxaemia and systemic hypotension accompanied by haemoconcentration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2006.tb12768.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LITSTER, A., & ATWELL, R.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Australian Veterinary Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
151-157
ISSN
  • 0005-0423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-0813
OpenAlex
W1967095410
Cited by
18
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Veterinary Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, feline heartworm disease, aluminum hydroxide adjuvant, antigen challenge, hypotension, hypoxemia, dyspnea, hemoconcentration, hematological changes, neutrophil count, eosinophil count, platelet count
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Anaphylaxis, Animals, Hypoxia, Antigens, Helminth, Apnea, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Hypotension, Random Allocation, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review