Cited by 165Skin Protection and AgingTea Polyphenols and EffectsPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Protection against ultraviolet-B radiation-induced local and systemic suppression of contact hypersensitivity and edema responses in C3H/HeN mice by green tea polyphenols

Katiyar, Santosh K., Elmets, Craig A., Agarwal, Rajesh, Mukhtar, Hasan·1995·Photochemistry and Photobiology

Abstract

Abstract— Exposure of skin to UV radiation can cause diverse biological effects, including induction of inflammation, alteration in cutaneous immune cells and impairment of contact hypersensitivity (CHS) responses. Our laboratory has demonstrated that oral feeding as well as topical application of a poly‐phenolic fraction isolated from green tea (GTP) affords protection against the carcinogenic effects of UVB (280–320 nm) radiation. In this study, we investigated whether GTP could protect against UVB‐induced immunosuppression and cutaneous inflammatory responses in C3H mice. Immunosuppression was assessed by contact sensitization with 2,4‐dinitrofluorobenzene applied to UVB‐irradiated skin (local suppression) or to a distant site (systemic suppression), while double skin‐fold swelling was used as the measure of UVB‐induced inflammation. Topical application of GTP (1–6 mg/animal), 30 min prior to or 30 min after exposure to a single dose of UVB (2 kj/m 2) resulted in significant protection against local (25–90%) and systemic suppression (23–95%) of CHS and inflammation in mouse dorsal skin (70–80%). These protective effects were dependent on the dose of GTP employed; increasing the dose (1–6 mg/animal) resulted in an increased protective effect (25–93%). The protective effects were also dependent on the dose of UVB (2–32 kJ/m 2). Among the four major epicatechin derivatives present in GTP, (‐)‐epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate, the major constituent in GTP, was found to be the most effective in affording protection against UVB‐caused CHS and inflammatory responses. Our study suggests that green tea, specifically polyphenols present therein, may be useful against inflammatory dermatoses and immunosuppression caused by solar radiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1995.tb09147.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katiyar, S. K., Elmets, C. A., Agarwal, R., & Mukhtar, H.
Affiliations
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Venue
Photochemistry and Photobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-11
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
855-861
ISSN
  • 0031-8655 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-1097
OpenAlex
W1975943298
Cited by
165
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Photochemistry and Photobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca057643-02, 5r01ca051802-09, 5r01ar032593-11)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 57643, CA51802)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-32593)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
green tea polyphenols, UV-B radiation, contact hypersensitivity, immunosuppression, skin edema, epigallocatechin gallate, epicatechin, topical application, 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene, skin inflammation, C3H mice, photoprotection
MeSH terms
Animals, Dermatitis, Contact, Edema, Female, Flavonoids, Immune Tolerance, Mice, Inbred C3H, Phenols, Polymers, Skin, Skin Diseases, Tea, Ultraviolet Rays, Mice, Polyphenols

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review