The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calculated Ultraviolet Exposure Levels for a Healthy Vitamin D Status
Abstract
The dangers of overexposure to sunlight have been well publicized, but less attention has been given to an acknowledged benefit of exposure to UV radiation; that being the cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D3. Here we define a standard vitamin D dose on the basis of recently recommended requirements for vitamin D that take account of its risk reduction role in a variety of diseases, and present a web-based tool that enables the reader to calculate associated exposure times for any time and place using either default values or user-selected conditions. Either it is not possible to synthesize vitamin D3 at high latitudes in winter, or the exposure time required to reach a standard dose is sometimes impractical. Where solar UV is sufficient, a risk-benefit analysis of sunburn vs. vitamin D3 synthesis shows that the best time for brief sun exposure is in the middle of the day. For low solar elevation angles common at high latitudes, a fine line exists between adequate UV exposure for vitamin D3 synthesis and a risk of sun burn.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI
Fitzpatrick, T. B. (1988) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008 · Cited by 4,339
MacLaughlin, J. A., Anderson, R. R., & Holick, M. F. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6281884 · Cited by 539
Cited by
Bio-Integrated Wearable Systems: A Comprehensive Review
Ray, T. R., Choi, J., Bandodkar, A. J., Krishnan, S., Gutruf, P., Tian, L., Ghaffari, R., & Rogers, J. A. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00573 · Cited by 1,350
Ozone depletion and climate change: impacts on UV radiation
McKenzie, R. L., Aucamp, P. J., Bais, A. F., Björn, L. O., Ilyas, M., & Madronich, S. (2011) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/c0pp90034f · Cited by 609
Considerations for lighting in the built environment: Non-visual effects of light
Webb, A. R. (2006) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.004 · Cited by 240
Self-citationHuijser, A., Pezzella, A., & Sundström, V. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c1cp20131j · Cited by 90
Wakayo, T., Belachew, T., Vatanparast, H., & Whiting, S. J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120963 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Webb, A. R., & Engelsen, O.
- Venue
- Photochemistry and Photobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1697-1703
- ISSN
- 0031-8655 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-1097
- OpenAlex
- W2178418634
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calculated Ultraviolet Exposure Levels for a Healthy Vitamin D Status. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2006.tb09833.x
- The paper
- Webb, A. R., & Engelsen, O. (2006). Calculated Ultraviolet Exposure Levels for a Healthy Vitamin D Status. Photochemistry and Photobiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2006.tb09833.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.