The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Retracted: Predictive Validity of a Medication Adherence Measure in an Outpatient Setting
Open accessAbstract
This study examines the psychometric properties and tests the concurrent and predictive validity of a structured, self-reported medication adherence measure in patients with hypertension. The authors also assessed various psychosocial determinants of adherence, such as knowledge, social support, satisfaction with care, and complexity of the medical regimen. A total of 1367 patients participated in the study; mean age was 52.5 years, 40.8% were male, 76.5% were black, 50.8% graduated from high school, 26% were married, and 54.1% had income <$5,000. The 8-item medication adherence scale was reliable (alpha=.83) and significantly associated with blood pressure control (P<.05). Using a cutpoint of <6, the sensitivity of the measure to identify patients with poor blood pressure control was estimated to be 93%, and the specificity was 53%. The medication adherence measure proved to be reliable, with good concurrent and predictive validity in primarily low-income, minority patients with hypertension and might function as a screening tool in outpatient settings with other patient groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“however, it is unclear if the differences are of any clinical significance, as the scores on this measure would still meet the cut-off for 'low adherence'.”
From Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis (2023) · cites this paper as Morisky 2008
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“There was a difference of 1.72 in favour of the intervention on the MMAS-8 (Morisky 2008);”
From Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis (2023) · cites this paper as Morisky 2008
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Chobanian, A. V. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.19.2560 · Cited by 25,386
Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data
Kearney, P. M., Whelton, M., Reynolds, K., Muntner, P., Whelton, P. K., & He, J. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)17741-1 · Cited by 8,698
Concurrent and Predictive Validity of a Self-reported Measure of Medication Adherence
Morisky, D. E., Green, L. W., & Levine, D. M. (1986) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198601000-00007 · Cited by 5,399
Self-citationPatient Adherence and Medical Treatment Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
Robin DiMatteo, M., Giordani, P. J., Lepper, H. S., & Croghan, T. W. (2002) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200209000-00009 · Cited by 1,490
Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among United States Adults 1999–2004
Ong, K. L., Cheung, B. M. Y., Man, Y. B., Lau, C. P., & Lam, K. S. L. (2007) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000252676.46043.18 · Cited by 1,395
The Burden of Adult Hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000: A Rising Tide
Fields, L. E., Burt, V. L., Cutler, J. A., Hughes, J., Roccella, E. J., & Sorlie, P. (2004) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000142248.54761.56 · Cited by 906
Time-Limit Tests: Estimating their Reliability and Degree of Speeding
Cronbach, L. J., & Warrington, W. G. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289113 · Cited by 675
Development and Testing of the Hill‐Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale
Kim, M. T., Hill, M. N., Bone, L. R., & Levine, D. M. (2000) · Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7117.2000.tb00211.x · Cited by 514
Krousel-Wood, M. A., Thomas, S., Muntner, P., & Morisky, D. E. (2004) · Current Opinion in Cardiology · doi:10.1097/01.hco.0000126978.03828.9e · Cited by 417
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.2105/AJPH.86.12.1805 · DOI
- Krousel‐Wood MA, 2004, Low adherence to prescribed antihypertension medication and poorer quality of life in elderly hypertensive patients
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Medication adherence measures: An overview
Lam, W. Y., & Fresco, P. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/217047 · Cited by 1,308
Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial – 2020
Barroso, W. K. S., Rodrigues, C. I. S., Bortolotto, L. A., Gomes, M. A. M., Brandão, A. A., Feitosa, A. D. M., Machado, C. A., Poli‐de‐Figueiredo, C. E., Amodeo, C., Mion, D., et al. (2021) · Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia · doi:10.36660/abc.20201238 · Cited by 1,394
Carey, R. M., Calhoun, D. A., Bakris, G. L., Brook, R. D., Daugherty, S. L., Dennison-Himmelfarb, C. R., Egan, B. M., Flack, J. M., Gidding, S. S., Judd, E., et al. (2018) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hyp.0000000000000084 · Cited by 1,153
Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection
Li, H. K., Rombach, I., Zambellas, R., Walker, A. S., McNally, M., Atkins, B. L., Lipsky, B. A., Hughes, H. C., Bose, D., Kümin, M., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1710926 · Cited by 942
Adherence in Hypertension: A Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Impact, and Management
Burnier, M., & Egan, B. M. (2019) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.313220 · Cited by 878
Metadata
- Authors
- Morisky, D. E., Ang, A., Krousel‐Wood, M., & Ward, H. J.
- Affiliations
- Tulane University (US)
- ORCID
- Morisky, Donald E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 348-354
- ISSN
- 1524-6175 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7176
- PMC
- PMC2562622
- OpenAlex
- W1966242613
- Cited by
- 2,877
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 91 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 178 · 2023: 229 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 217 · 2020: 223 · 2019: 199 · 2018: 229 · 2017: 254 · 2016: 207 · 2015: 217 · 2014: 176 · 2013: 110 · 2012: 78
- FWCI
- 25.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Update notices
- retraction (2023-08-18)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. Public Health Service (R0-H251119)
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG022536, AG022536)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007656)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Keywords
- medication adherence, hypertension, predictive validity, concurrent validity, psychometric properties, blood pressure control, social support, treatment satisfaction, medication regimen complexity, screening tool, outpatient care
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Ambulatory Care, Antihypertensive Agents, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
