Cited by 235Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological and Geochemical AnalysisScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

Proposal for an international molybdenum isotope measurement standard and data representation

Nägler, Thomas F., Anbar, Ariel D., Archer, Corey, Goldberg, Tatiana, Gordon, Gwyneth W., Greber, Nicolas D., Siebert, Christopher, Sohrin, Yoshiki +1 more·2014·Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research

Abstract

Molybdenum isotopes are increasingly widely applied in Earth Sciences. They are primarily used to investigate the oxygenation of Earth's ocean and atmosphere. However, more and more fields of application are being developed, such as magmatic and hydrothermal processes, planetary sciences or the tracking of environmental pollution. Here, we present a proposal for a unifying presentation of Mo isotope ratios in the studies of mass‐dependent isotope fractionation. We suggest that the δ 98/95 Mo of the NIST SRM 3134 be defined as +0.25‰. The rationale is that the vast majority of published data are presented relative to reference materials that are similar, but not identical, and that are all slightly lighter than NIST SRM 3134. Our proposed data presentation allows a direct first‐order comparison of almost all old data with future work while referring to an international measurement standard. In particular, canonical δ 98/95 Mo values such as +2.3‰ for seawater and −0.7‰ for marine Fe–Mn precipitates can be kept for discussion. As recent publications show that the ocean molybdenum isotope signature is homogeneous, the IAPSO ocean water standard or any other open ocean water sample is suggested as a secondary measurement standard, with a defined δ 98/95 Mo value of +2.34 ± 0.10‰ (2 s ).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2013.00275.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uncertainties shown in Fig. 1 represent 2 SD of the mean (analytical precision) plus the propagated uncertainty from matching in-house reference materials to the universal standard NIST SRM 3136 where seawater display δ98/95Mo = 2.3 ‰.

    “Uncertainties shown in Fig. 1 represent 2 SD of the mean (analytical precision) plus the propagated uncertainty from matching in-house reference materials to the universal standard NIST SRM 3136 where seawater display δ 98/95 Mo = 2.3 ‰ (75, 76).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nägler, T. F., Anbar, A. D., Archer, C., Goldberg, T., Gordon, G. W., Greber, N. D., Siebert, C., Sohrin, Y., & Vance, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nägler, Thomas F.
Venue
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-02
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
149-151
ISSN
  • 0150-5505 (ISSN-L)
  • 1639-4488
  • 1751-908X
OpenAlex
W1967074798
Cited by
235
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/I017585/1, NE/G01308X/1)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24241004)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Keywords
molybdenum isotopes, reference materials, mass-dependent fractionation, ocean oxygenation, measurement standards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review