The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Stormwater Lag Times for Low Impact and Traditional Residential Development1
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: This study compared lag time characteristics of low impact residential development with traditional residential development. Also compared were runoff volume, peak discharge, hydrograph kurtosis, runoff coefficient, and runoff threshold. Low impact development (LID) had a significantly greater centroid lag‐to‐peak, centroid lag, lag‐to‐peak, and peak lag‐to‐peak times than traditional development. Traditional development had a significantly greater depth of discharge and runoff coefficient than LID. The peak discharge in runoff from the traditional development was 1,100% greater than from the LID. The runoff threshold of the LID (6.0 mm) was 100% greater than the traditional development (3.0 mm). The hydrograph shape for the LID watershed had a negative value of kurtosis indicating a leptokurtic distribution, while traditional development had a positive value of kurtosis indicating a platykurtic distribution. The lag times of the LID were significantly greater than the traditional watershed for small (<25.4 mm) but not large (≥25.4 mm) storms; short duration (<4 h) but not long duration (≥4 h) storms; and low antecedent moisture condition (AMC; <25.4 mm) storms but not high AMC (≥25.4 mm) storms. This study indicates that LID resulted in lowered peak discharge depth, runoff coefficient, and discharge volume and increased lag times and runoff threshold compared with traditional residential development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The effects of low impact development on urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics
Qin, H.-P., Li, Z.-X., & Fu, G. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.026 · Cited by 552
Winston, R. J., Dorsey, J. D., & Hunt, W. F. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.081 · Cited by 229
Loperfido, J. V., Noe, G. B., Jarnagin, S. T., & Hogan, D. M. (2014) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.007 · Cited by 204
Jefferson, A. J., Bhaskar, A. S., Hopkins, K. G., Fanelli, R., Avellaneda, P. M., & McMillan, S. K. (2017) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.11347 · Cited by 203
Askarizadeh, A., Rippy, M. A., Fletcher, T. D., Feldman, D. L., Peng, J., Bowler, P., Mehring, A. S., Winfrey, B. K., Vrugt, J. A., AghaKouchak, A., et al. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01635 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Hood, M. J., Clausen, J. C., & Warner, G. S.
- Venue
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1036-1046
- ISSN
- 1093-474X (ISSN-L)
- 1752-1688
- OpenAlex
- W2138435550
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Stormwater Lag Times for Low Impact and Traditional Residential Development1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00085.x
- The paper
- Hood, M. J., Clausen, J. C., & Warner, G. S. (2007). Comparison of Stormwater Lag Times for Low Impact and Traditional Residential Development1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00085.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
