Cited by 54Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesEvaluation and Performance AssessmentMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Statistical analysis for identifying mediating variables in public health dentistry interventions

Open access
MacKinnon, David P., Luecken, Linda J.·2011·Journal of Public Health Dentistry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article provides an overview of statistical mediation analysis methods in the evaluation of public health dentistry interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: First, reasons for conducting mediation analysis are outlined, followed by a discussion of the link between the mediation model and theoretical bases of interventions. Second, the basic statistical procedures in mediation analysis are presented. An example application to data from a hypothetical intervention is provided in Appendix A. Third, interpretation of the results from statistical mediation analysis is described along with additional information pertinent to identifying true mediation relations. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for describing mediation analyses in research articles related to public health dentistry intervention studies are outlined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00252.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacKinnon, D. P., & Luecken, L. J.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
MacKinnon, David P.
Venue
Journal of Public Health Dentistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
71
Issue
s1
Pages
S37-46
ISSN
  • 0022-4006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7325
OpenAlex
W1721043408
Cited by
54
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA009757, DA0957)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
mediation analysis, intervention evaluation, mediation model, reporting guidelines
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Health Promotion, Humans, Oral Health, Psychological Theory, Public Health Dentistry, Research Design, Models, Statistical, Health Behavior, Guidelines as Topic, Behavioral Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review