Cited by 118Dental Health and Care UtilizationOral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Research and COVID-19

The oral health of psychiatric in‐patients in South Wales

Lewis, Susan, Jagger, Robert G., Treasure, Elizabeth·2001·Special Care in Dentistry

Abstract

Little information is available regarding the oral health of hospitalized psychiatric patients. The aims of the study were: to quantify the oral health status and identify dental treatment needs of hospitalized psychiatric patients in South Wales; and to compare the oral health of subgroups within the population by their age, psychiatric diagnosis, psychotropic medication use, and length of stay. The total patient population of the hospitals involved in the study was 469, and 326 subjects (70%) took part in the study. The mean age of the subjects was 71.1 years, with 265 long‐stay and 61 short‐stay patients. Forty‐seven percent of patients had a psychiatric diagnosis of dementia, 23% of schizophrenia, and 19% of depressive illness. The examination included assessment of oral hygiene, periodontal condition, and prevalence of caries. The treatment needs of the population were also determined. It was found that 63% of the population was edentulous. The mean DMFT score was 19.1 ± 7.9 (SD). Comparison with the DMFT of the general population showed a similar level of decay, fewer filled teeth, and more missing teeth in the study population. The oral hygiene of the dentate population was poor, and there was little periodontal disease. Treatment needs were mainly for scaling and polishing. There were no significant differences found between subgroups within the population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2001.tb00252.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, S., Jagger, R. G., & Treasure, E.
Affiliations
University of Wales (GB)
Venue
Special Care in Dentistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-09
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
182-186
ISSN
  • 0275-1879 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-4505
OpenAlex
W2054884816
Cited by
118
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Special Care in Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
oral health, psychiatric inpatients, dental caries, DMFT index, edentulism, periodontal disease, oral hygiene, psychotropic drugs, dementia, schizophrenia, depressive disorders, dental treatment needs, South Wales
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Child, Chronic Disease, Dental Caries, DMF Index, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth, Edentulous, Oral Health, Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Diseases, Periodontal Index, Wales, Prevalence, Dental Care for Chronically Ill

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review