The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing: the trn L approach
Abstract
The development of DNA barcoding (species identification using a standardized DNA sequence), and the availability of recent DNA sequencing techniques offer new possibilities in diet analysis. DNA fragments shorter than 100–150 bp remain in a much higher proportion in degraded DNA samples and can be recovered from faeces. As a consequence, by using universal primers that amplify a very short but informative DNA fragment, it is possible to reliably identify the plant taxon that has been eaten. According to our experience and using this identification system, about 50% of the taxa can be identified to species using the trn L approach, that is, using the P6 loop of the chloroplast trn L (UAA) intron. We demonstrated that this new method is fast, simple to implement, and very robust. It can be applied for diet analyses of a wide range of phytophagous species at large scales. We also demonstrated that our approach is efficient for mammals, birds, insects and molluscs. This method opens new perspectives in ecology, not only by allowing large‐scale studies on diet, but also by enhancing studies on resource partitioning among competing species, and describing food webs in ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Pearson, W. R., & Lipman, D. J. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · Cited by 11,227
The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity
Duffy, J. E., Cardinale, B. J., France, K. E., McIntyre, P. B., Thébault, E., & Loreau, M. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01037.x · Cited by 1,065
Amplification of complex gene libraries by emulsion PCR
Williams, R., Peisajovich, S. G., Miller, O. J., Magdassi, S., Tawfik, D. S., & Griffiths, A. D. (2006) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth896 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Environmental DNA – An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity
Thomsen, P. F., & Willerslev, E. (2015) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.019 · Cited by 2,082
Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding
TABERLET, P., COISSAC, E., POMPANON, F., BROCHMANN, C., & WILLERSLEV, E. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05470.x · Cited by 1,907
Self-citationLeray, M., Yang, J. Y., Meyer, C. P., Mills, S. C., Agudelo, N., Ranwez, V., Boehm, J. T., & Machida, R. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-10-34 · Cited by 1,636
Valentini, A., Pompanon, F., & Taberlet, P. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationTaxon‐specific PCR for DNA barcoding arthropod prey in bat faeces
ZEALE, M. R. K., BUTLIN, R. K., BARKER, G. L. A., LEES, D. C., & JONES, G. (2011) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02920.x · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- VALENTINI, A., MIQUEL, C., NAWAZ, M. A., BELLEMAIN, E., COISSAC, E., POMPANON, F., GIELLY, L., CRUAUD, C., NASCETTI, G., WINCKER, P., SWENSON, J. E., & TABERLET, P.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology Resources
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-60
- ISSN
- 1755-098X (ISSN-L)
- 1755-0998
- OpenAlex
- W2135844635
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing: the trn L approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02352.x
- The paper
- VALENTINI, A., MIQUEL, C., NAWAZ, M. A., BELLEMAIN, E., COISSAC, E., POMPANON, F., GIELLY, L., CRUAUD, C., NASCETTI, G., WINCKER, P., SWENSON, J. E., & TABERLET, P. (2009). New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing: the trn L approach. Molecular Ecology Resources. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02352.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.