Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Syntrophic butyrate and propionate oxidation processes: from genomes to reaction mechanisms

Open access
Müller, Nicolai, Worm, Petra, Schink, Bernhard, Stams, Alfons J. M., Plugge, Caroline M.·2010·Environmental Microbiology Reports

Abstract

Summary: In anoxic environments such as swamps, rice fields and sludge digestors, syntrophic microbial communities are important for decomposition of organic matter to CO 2 and CH 4 . The most difficult step is the fermentative degradation of short‐chain fatty acids such as propionate and butyrate. Conversion of these metabolites to acetate, CO 2 , formate and hydrogen is endergonic under standard conditions and occurs only if methanogens keep the concentrations of these intermediate products low. Butyrate and propionate degradation pathways include oxidation steps of comparably high redox potential, i.e. oxidation of butyryl‐CoA to crotonyl‐CoA and of succinate to fumarate, respectively, that require investment of energy to release the electrons as hydrogen or formate. Although investigated for several decades, the biochemistry of these reactions is still not completely understood. Genome analysis of the butyrate‐oxidizing Syntrophomonas wolfei and Syntrophus aciditrophicus and of the propionate‐oxidizing Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans and Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum reveals the presence of energy‐transforming protein complexes. Recent studies indicated that S. wolfei uses electron‐transferring flavoproteins coupled to a menaquinone loop to drive butyryl‐CoA oxidation, and that S. fumaroxidans uses a periplasmic formate dehydrogenase, cytochrome b :quinone oxidoreductases, a menaquinone loop and a cytoplasmic fumarate reductase to drive energy‐dependent succinate oxidation. Furthermore, we propose that homologues of the Thermotoga maritima bifurcating [FeFe]‐hydrogenase are involved in NADH oxidation by S. wolfei and S. fumaroxidans to form hydrogen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00147.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Müller, N., Worm, P., Schink, B., Stams, A. J. M., & Plugge, C. M.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology Reports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-16
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
489-499
ISSN
1758-2229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133076891
Cited by
326
References
8
FWCI
31.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Syntrophic butyrate and propionate oxidation processes: from genomes to reaction mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00147.x
The paper
Müller, N., Worm, P., Schink, B., Stams, A. J. M., & Plugge, C. M. (2010). Syntrophic butyrate and propionate oxidation processes: from genomes to reaction mechanisms. Environmental Microbiology Reports. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00147.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.