The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MANAGING PRODUCT RETURNS FOR REMANUFACTURING
Abstract
Firms are often encouraged to offer environmentally friendly products as a demonstration of corporate citizenship. However, this may prove to be an unrealistic expectation since a rational firm will only engage in profitable ventures; those that increase shareholder wealth. We develop a framework for analyzing the profitability of reuse activities and show how the management of product returns influences operational requirements. We show that the acquisition of used products may be used as the control lever for the management and profitability of reuse activities. These activities, termed product acquisition management, affect several important business decisions. First, if a firm is to pursue reuse activities, these reuse activities must be value‐creating. Second, if a firm is to compete by offering remanufactured products, then we show how product returns management influences the overall profitability of such activities via a trial and error EVA approach. Third, we show how operational issues are strongly affected by the approach used to manage product returns. There is a need for future research specifying the mathematical relationship between acquisition price and the nominal quality of the returned product.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review
Srivastava, S. K. (2007) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x · Cited by 3,984
Witjes, S., & Lozano, R. (2016) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015 · Cited by 655
Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001 · Cited by 537
Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: the case of local government
Preuss, L. (2009) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598540910954557 · Cited by 385
Resource duration as a managerial indicator for Circular Economy performance
Franklin-Johnson, E., Figge, F., & Canning, L. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.023 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- GUIDE, V. D. R., & VANWASSENHOVE, L. N.
- Venue
- Production and Operations Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 142-155
- ISSN
- 1059-1478 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-5956
- OpenAlex
- W2042958390
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MANAGING PRODUCT RETURNS FOR REMANUFACTURING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00075.x
- The paper
- GUIDE, V. D. R., & VANWASSENHOVE, L. N. (2001). MANAGING PRODUCT RETURNS FOR REMANUFACTURING. Production and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00075.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.