The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Field Study of RFID Deployment and Return Expectations
Open accessAbstract
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology promises to transform supply chain management. Building on previous research in information systems and supply chain management, this paper proposes a theoretical framework for RFID adoption and benefits, and tests the framework using data on u. s. firms. Our analysis suggests that there is a positive association between information technology (IT) application deployment and RFID adoption. We find that RFID implementation spending and partner mandate are associated with an expectation of early return on RFID investment, and a perceived lack of industry‐wide standards is associated with an expectation of delayed return on RFID investment. These results suggest that firms with broad IT application deployment and a critical mass of RFID implementation spending are more likely to report early returns from RFID deployments. This paper extends previous research to understand the relationship between organization characteristics and adoption and expected benefits of the emerging RFID technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. (1984) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250050306 · Cited by 3,337
Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective1
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036518 · Cited by 1,639
Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study1
Chau, P. Y. K., & Tam, K. Y. (1997) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249740 · Cited by 1,067
Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures
Hitt, L. M., Wu, D. J., & Zhou, X. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045716 · Cited by 877
Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.275.82 · Cited by 779
Why Do Customer Relationship Management Applications Affect Customer Satisfaction?
Mithas, S., Krishnan, M. S., & Fornell, C. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.201 · Cited by 776
Self-citationAn Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems*
Grover, V. (1993) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb01295.x · Cited by 757 · cited 4×
“Prior studies found a relationship between firm size and the adoption of technical innovations (Damanpour 1992; DeLone 1981; Grover 1993; Lehman 1985; Moch and Morse 1977), and subsequent studies confirm empirically that firm size is significant in predicting IOS adoption (Mithas et al.”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Cited by
RFID for Better Supply‐Chain Management through Enhanced Information Visibility
Delen, D., Hardgrave, B. C., & Sharda, R. (2007) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00284.x · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Whitaker, J., Mithas, S., & Krishnan, M. S.
- Venue
- Production and Operations Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 599-612
- ISSN
- 1059-1478 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-5956
- OpenAlex
- W2148770201
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 43.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Field Study of RFID Deployment and Return Expectations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00283.x
- The paper
- Whitaker, J., Mithas, S., & Krishnan, M. S. (2007). A Field Study of RFID Deployment and Return Expectations. Production and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00283.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
