The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is Adding the E Enough? Investigating the Impact of K‐12 Engineering Standards on the Implementation of STEM Integration
Abstract
The problems that we face in our ever‐changing, increasingly global society are multidisciplinary, and many require the integration of multiple science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) concepts to solve them. National calls for improvement of STEM education in the United States are driving changes in policy, particularly in academic standards. Research on STEM integration in K‐12 classrooms has not kept pace with the sweeping policy changes in STEM education. This study addresses the need for research to explore the translation of broad, national‐level policy statements regarding STEM education and integration to state‐level policies and implementation in K‐12 classrooms. An interpretive multicase study design was employed to conduct an in‐depth investigation of secondary STEM teachers' implementation of STEM integration in their classrooms during a yearlong professional development program. The interpretive approach was used because it provides holistic descriptions and explanations for the particular phenomenon, in this case STEM integration. The results of this study demonstrate the possibilities of policies that use state standards documents as a mechanism to integrate engineering into science standards. Our cases suggest that STEM integration can be implemented most successfully when mathematics and science teachers work together both in a single classroom (co‐teaching) and in multiple classrooms (content teaching—common theme).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
Lewis, S. (2015) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839915580941 · Cited by 22,105
(1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 18,397
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
(1979) · The Mathematics Teacher · doi:10.5951/mt.72.8.0637 · Cited by 8,499
National Science Education Standards
Shea, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Geological Education · doi:10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.102 · Cited by 7,888
Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed.
Creswell, J. W. (2007) · Cited by 4,999
Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x · Cited by 2,801
Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future
Augustine, N. R. (2006) · Cited by 2,064
National Science Education Standards: (302882005-001)
The National Academy of Sciences; The Center for Education (1996) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e302882005-001 · Cited by 1,555
(2020) · Human Rights Documents Online · doi:10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9978-20190011 · Cited by 1,382
Advancing engineering education in P–12 classrooms
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x · Cited by 910
Cited by
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K. F., Lee, M., Sanusi, I. T., Dai, Y., & Chai, C. S. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104582 · Cited by 469
Creation and Evaluation of a Pretertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI) Curriculum
Chiu, T. K. F., Meng, H., Chai, C.-S., King, I., Wong, S., & Yam, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2021.3085878 · Cited by 380
NGSS and the landscape of engineering in K-12 state science standards
Moore, T. J., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Kersten, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21199 · Cited by 179
Self-citation(2023) · doi:10.3102/00346543221105550 · Cited by 159
A Meta-analysis of STEM Integration on Student Academic Achievement
Zhou, S., Dong, Z., Wang, H. H., & Chiu, M. M. (2025) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-024-10216-y · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H., & Park, M. S.
- Venue
- School Science and Mathematics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-44
- ISSN
- 0036-6803 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-8594
- OpenAlex
- W2151271326
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 43.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Adding the E Enough? Investigating the Impact of K‐12 Engineering Standards on the Implementation of STEM Integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.x
- The paper
- Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H., & Park, M. S. (2012). Is Adding the E Enough? Investigating the Impact of K‐12 Engineering Standards on the Implementation of STEM Integration. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.