Cited by 56Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTechnology Use by Older Adults

Is computerized cognitive‐behavioural therapy a treatment option for depression in late‐life? A systematic review

Crabb, Rebecca M., Cavanagh, Kate, Proudfoot, Judy, Learmonth, Despina, Rafie, Samantha, Weingardt, Kenneth R.·2012·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objective. Computerized cognitive‐behavioural therapy (CCBT) may enhance older adults’ access to evidence‐based depression treatment. Our objective was to determine the extent to which adults aged 65 years and older are represented in existing studies of CCBT for depression and describe available data on recruitment, retention, and outcomes. Methods. We retrieved all controlled and uncontrolled trials of CCBT for depression published between 2000 and 2010. We obtained data on older adults via the article text or correspondence with authors. Results. Older adults comprised approximately 3% of study participants in reviewed studies. Authors reported that older participants may be less likely than younger adults to drop out, but more likely to experience technical challenges. Conclusions. Older adults are under‐represented in studies of CCBT for depression. Practitioner Points: CCBT may be a means to help older adults gain access to evidence‐based treatment for depression. According to our systematic review, existing studies of CCBT for depression have included very few older participants. Comments by authors of studies suggest that older adults are at least as likely as younger adults to persist with CCBT programs but may be more likely to require technical support. Practitioners should be aware that older adults are increasingly using the Internet for health reasons and may also benefit from Internet‐based interventions for depression. A limitation of our study is the fact that older adults who have participated in trials of CCBT for depression may be more comfortable with computer use than older adults in general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2012.02038.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crabb, R. M., Cavanagh, K., Proudfoot, J., Learmonth, D., Rafie, S., & Weingardt, K. R.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Palo Alto University (US)
Corresponding author
Weingardt, Kenneth R.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-16
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
459-464
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W1537963754
Cited by
56
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
geriatric depression, older adults, underrepresentation in clinical trials, participant recruitment and retention, dropout, technical challenges, online intervention, access to mental health care
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review