Cited by 417Stress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Burnout

Occupational stress, job characteristics, coping, and the mental health of nurses

Mark, G., Smith, A. P.·2012·British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

Objectives This study investigated the relationships between job characteristics and coping in predicting levels of anxiety and depression in nurses. The study was based on current theories of occupational stress, and predictors included job demands, social support, decision authority and skill discretion control, effort, over-commitment, rewards, and ways of coping. It was predicted that job demands, extrinsic effort, over-commitment, and negative coping behaviours would be positively associated with depression and anxiety, and social support, rewards, decision authority, skill discretion control, and positive coping would be negatively associated with depression and anxiety. Methods Participants were 870 nurses, who responded to a bulk mail sent randomly to 4,000 nurses from the south of England. Results The results showed that job demands, extrinsic effort, and over-commitment were associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression. Social support, rewards, and skill discretion were negatively associated with mental health problems. Few interactions were found between the variables. Coping behaviours significantly added to the explanation of variance in anxiety and depression outcomes, over and above the use of demand-control-support, and effort-reward factors alone. Conclusion The results from the study demonstrated the importance of coping factors in work-stress research, in accordance with the multi-factorial premise of transactional stress models. It is argued tha…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02051.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mark, G., & Smith, A. P.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, A. P.
Venue
British Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-14
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
505-521
ISSN
  • 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8287
OpenAlex
W2104750499
Cited by
417
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
occupational stress, nurses, job characteristics, coping, anxiety, depression, mental health, job demands, social support, reward, decision-making power, skill discretion, effort-reward balance, transactional model of stress and coping, overcommitment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Mental Disorders, Employment, England, Female, Humans, Job Description, Job Satisfaction, Male, Mental Health, Nurses, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Workload, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review