The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More than just a game: Research developments and issues in competitive anxiety in sport
Abstract
This paper provides a critical overview of developments and issues in competitive anxiety research. The discussion is divided into sections dealing with general arousal‐based approaches, general anxiety‐based approaches and, finally, multidimensional anxiety‐based approaches. The major emphasis is on multidimensional anxiety‐based approaches, in which a number of factors and issues surrounding the competitive anxiety response are addressed, including: conceptual and measurement developments; antecedents of competitive anxiety; temporal patterning of the response; and frequency of competition‐related cognitive intrusions. Research which has examined the relationship between multidimensional anxiety and performance is considered in detail, including debilitative and facilitative competitive anxiety states and catastrophe models. A control model of debilitative and facilitative competitive anxiety is proposed. Finally, recommendations for future research are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Preliminary exploration of worry: Some characteristics and processes
Borkovec, T. D., Robinson, E., Pruzinsky, T., & DePree, J. A. (1983) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(83)90121-3 · Cited by 1,468
Cited by
The relationship between psychological skills usage and competitive anxiety responses
Fletcher, D., & Hanton, S. (2001) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/s1469-0292(00)00014-5 · Cited by 137
“In two pivotal review papers, Jones (1991, 1995) introduced the notion of “direction” as a result of dissatisfaction with the “intensity alone” approach adopted in typical uses of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2; Martens, Burton, Vealey, Bump & Smith, 1990).”
MethodConfirmatory factor analysis of the competitive state anxiety inventory-2
LANE, A. M., SEWELL, D. F., TERRY, P. C., BARTRAM, D., & NESTI, M. S. (1999) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/026404199365812 · Cited by 121
Turner, M., & Barker, J. B. (2013) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200.2011.574311 · Cited by 116
Exams? Why worry? Interpreting anxiety as facilitative and stress appraisals
Strack, J., & Esteves, F. (2015) · Anxiety, Stress, & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2014.931942 · Cited by 52
Basic Psychological Skills Usage and Competitive Anxiety Responses: Perceived Underlying Mechanisms
Wadey, R., & Hanton, S. (2008) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2008.10599500 · Cited by 46
Marshall, E. A., & Gibson, A.-M. (2017) · Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity · doi:10.1515/jirspa-2016-0009 · Cited by 40
Lane, A. M., Harwood, C., & Nevill, A. M. (2005) · Anxiety, Stress, & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615800500134266 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 449-478
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W2011780773
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
