The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Knowledge and conscious control of motor actions under stress
Abstract
A recent study by Masters (1992) investigated the effect of stress upon the performance of a well‐learned motor skill, golf putting, acquired under implicit and explicit learning conditions. Masters found that stress had a detrimental effect on performance for the explicit learning group but not for the implicit learning group. However, the implicit learning group was required to perform articulatory suppression during the learning trials but not during the stress trials. As such, it is possible that the subjects in the implicit learning group continued to improve during the stress session simply because they were performing an easier task. This paper reports an experiment which re‐examines Masters' (1992) conclusions by replicating and extending his method. An additional implicit learning group was included which was required to carry out articulatory suppression during both the learning trials and the stress trials. It was hypothesized that this ‘new’ implicit learning group would suffer the same disruption to performance as the explicit learning group, providing evidence which would contradict Masters' explanation. Thirty‐two subjects were allocated to one of four groups. Performance measures were analysed using two‐factor analysis of variance (4 × 5: groups × sessions) with repeated measures on the sessions factor. The main dependent variable was the number of putts successfully completed. The analysis revealed that both the implicit learning groups continued to improve their performance under stress whilst the explicit learning group did not. Despite limitations to both Masters' (1992) and the present study, these results add support to Masters' explicit knowledge hypothesis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“there is evidence that stress impedes attentional monitoring of the accuracy of choices (Reyes et al., 2015) and impedes information processing (Hardy et al., 1996).”
From Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (2018) · cites this paper as Hardy et al., 1996
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure?
Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.701 · Cited by 1,201
Writing About Testing Worries Boosts Exam Performance in the Classroom
Ramirez, G., & Beilock, S. L. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1199427 · Cited by 434
The role of working memory in motor learning and performance
Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., & Eves, F. F. (2003) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s1053-8100(03)00005-9 · Cited by 272
Modelling coaching practice: the role of instruction and demonstration
Hodges, N. J., & Franks, I. M. (2002) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/026404102320675648 · Cited by 218
Implicit perceptual training: how, when, and why?
Jackson, R. C., & Farrow, D. (2005) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.003 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Hardy, L., Mullen, R., & Jones, G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 621-636
- ISSN
- 0007-1269
- 2044-8295
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge and conscious control of motor actions under stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02612.x
- The paper
- Hardy, L., Mullen, R., & Jones, G. (1996). Knowledge and conscious control of motor actions under stress. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02612.x