Cited by 46Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

Unusual but sound minds: Mental health indicators in spiritual individuals

Farias, Miguel, Underwood, Raphael, Claridge, Gordon·2013·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Previous research has linked certain types of modern spirituality, including New Age and Pagan, with either benign schizotypy or insecure attachment. While the first view emphasizes a positive aspect of spiritual believers’ mental health (benign schizotypy), the second view emphasizes a negative aspect, namely the unhealthy emotional compensation associated with an insecure attachment style. This study addresses these two conflicting views by comparing a sample of modern spiritual individuals ( N = 114) with a contrast group of traditional religious believers ( N = 86). Measures of schizotypy and attachment style were combined with mental health scales of anxiety and depression. We further assessed death anxiety to determine whether modern spiritual beliefs fulfilled a similar function as traditional religious beliefs in the reduction of existential threat. Our results support a psychological contiguity between traditional and modern spiritual believers and reinforce the need to de‐stigmatize spiritual ideas and experiences. Using hierarchical regression, we showed that unusual experiences and ideas are the major predictor of engagement in modern spiritual practices. Anxiety, depression variables, and insecure attachment were not significant predictors of spirituality or correlated with them; on the other hand, the results show that spiritual believers report high social support satisfaction and this variable predicts involvement in modern spirituality. Further, spiritual practices were negatively correlated with and negatively predicted by death anxiety scores. Overall, the results strengthen the association between modern spirituality, good mental health, and general well‐being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02128.x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature on schizotypal traits and psychosis suggests that experiences usually categorized as anomalous can be offered positive appraisals, in which case they will not become distressing and harmful.

    “the literature on schizotypal traits and psychosis suggests that experiences which are usually categorized as anomalous can be offered positive appraisals, in which case they will not become distressing and harmful (117, 118).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farias, M., Underwood, R., & Claridge, G.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Farias, Miguel
  • Underwood, Raphael
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-17
Volume
104
Issue
3
Pages
364-381
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W1483864140
Cited by
46
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
contemporary spirituality, New Age, paganism, insecure attachment, mental health, anxiety, depression, fear of death, social support, well-being
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Attitude to Death, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Spiritualism, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review