The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discriminant validity of measures of job satisfaction, positive affectivity and negative affectivity
Abstract
The discriminant validity of measures used to assess job satisfaction, positive affectivity and negative affectivity was empirically evaluated using data collected from a sample of 550 employees of a 327‐bed Veterans Administration Medical Center. Confirmatory factor analysis with LISREL as the estimation technique was used to test the hypothesized three‐factor configuration. Results of this test and other data supported the discriminant validity of the three constructs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,023
Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.465 · Cited by 4,636
Employee reactions to job characteristics.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031152 · Cited by 2,442
Cited by
Organizational Behavior: Affect in the Workplace
Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135156 · Cited by 1,797
Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: An empirical investigation among ICT-SMEs
Valaei, N., & Rezaei, S. (2016) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-09-2015-0216 · Cited by 659
Thoresen, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R., & de Chermont, K. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.914 · Cited by 617
Progressing in the change journey towards sustainability in healthcare: The role of “Green” HRM
Pinzone, M., Guerci, M., Lettieri, E., & Redman, T. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.031 · Cited by 441
Walker, D. D., van Jaarsveld, D. D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034350 · Cited by 251
Metadata
- Authors
- Agho, A. O., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-195
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2096047502
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discriminant validity of measures of job satisfaction, positive affectivity and negative affectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00496.x
- The paper
- Agho, A. O., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1992). Discriminant validity of measures of job satisfaction, positive affectivity and negative affectivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00496.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
