Cited by 117Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyStudy and Philosophy of ReligionReligion and Society Interactions

Why do psychiatrists neglect religion

Neeleman, J., Persaud, R.·1995·British Journal of Medical Psychology

Abstract

This paper analyses a number of possible reasons why modern psychiatry has neglected the therapeutic effects of religious beliefs. The gap which exists between psychiatry and religion is a relatively recent phenomenon and is partly related to psychiatry's progress in elucidating the biological and psychological causes of mental illness, rendering religious explanations superfluous. In addition, it is often assumed that religious attitudes are inevitably linked with phenomena such as dependence and guilt which are frequently seen as undesirable. Psychiatrists and psychologists tend to be less religiously orientated than their patients, which may further increase the professional's idea that religious beliefs are associated with disturbance. However, it has long been suspected that a positive relation exists between religion and mental health, and recently, the psychology of religion has provided empirical support for this idea. Psychiatry faces the challenge to accommodate this evidence into theory and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1995.tb01823.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neeleman, J., & Persaud, R.
Affiliations
Maudsley Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Neeleman, J.
Venue
British Journal of Medical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-06
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
169-178
ISSN
0007-1129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061611407
Cited by
117
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Medical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religion and mental health, religious beliefs, religion and psychiatry, psychology of religion, religious guilt
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Healing, Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Religion and Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review