The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marginalization Paradoxes in Bayesian and Structural Inference
Abstract
Summary: We describe a range of routine statistical problems in which marginal posterior distributions derived from improper prior measures are found to have an unBayesian property—one that could not occur if proper prior measures were employed. This paradoxical possibility is shown to have several facets that can be successfully analysed in the framework of a general group structure. The results cast a shadow on the uncritical use of improper prior measures. A separate examination of a particular application of Fraser's structural theory shows that it is intrinsically paradoxical under marginalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bayes Estimates for the Linear Model
Lindley, D. V., & Smith, A. F. M. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00885.x · Cited by 2,025
Some Problems Connected with Statistical Inference
Cox, D. R. (1958) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177706618 · Cited by 536
Jaynes, E. T. (1973) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00709116 · Cited by 297
Cited by
Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars
Mayo, D. G. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781107286184 · Cited by 376
McCullagh, P. (2002) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1035844977 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Dawid, A. P., Stone, M., & Zidek, J. V.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1973-01-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-213
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W44951016
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
