The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures
Abstract
SUMMARY: A continuous two-dimensional region is partitioned into a fine rectangular array of sites or “pixels”, each pixel having a particular “colour” belonging to a prescribed finite set. The true colouring of the region is unknown but, associated with each pixel, there is a possibly multivariate record which conveys imperfect information about its colour according to a known statistical model. The aim is to reconstruct the true scene, with the additional knowledge that pixels close together tend to have the same or similar colours. In this paper, it is assumed that the local characteristics of the true scene can be represented by a non-degenerate Markov random field. Such information can be combined with the records by Bayes' theorem and the true scene can be estimated according to standard criteria. However, the computational burden is enormous and the reconstruction may reflect undesirable large-scale properties of the random field. Thus, a simple, iterative method of reconstruction is proposed, which does not depend on these large-scale characteristics. The method is illustrated by computer simulations in which the original scene is not directly related to the assumed random field. Some complications, including parameter estimation, are discussed. Potential applications are mentioned briefly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography
Shepp, L. A., & Vardi, Y. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.1982.4307558 · Cited by 4,429
A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography
Vardi, Y., Shepp, L. A., & Kaufman, L. (1985) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1985.10477119 · Cited by 863
Cited by
McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471721182 · Cited by 10,991
Fischl, B., Salat, D. H., Busa, E., Albert, M., Dieterich, M., Haselgrove, C., van der Kouwe, A., Killiany, R., Kennedy, D., Klaveness, S., et al. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x · Cited by 8,610
Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018 · Cited by 7,507
Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS)
Menze, B. H., Jakab, A., Bauer, S., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Farahani, K., Kirby, J., Burren, Y., Porz, N., Slotboom, J., Wiest, R., et al. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2014.2377694 · Cited by 6,781
Collective Classification in Network Data
Sen, P., Namata, G., Bilgic, M., Getoor, L., Gallagher, B., & Eliassi‐Rad, T. (2008) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v29i3.2157 · Cited by 3,293
Warfield, S. K., Zou, K. H., & Wells, W. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.828354 · Cited by 2,072
Generating Sentences from a Continuous Space
Bowman, S. R., Vilnis, L., Vinyals, O., Dai, A., Jozefowicz, R., & Bengio, S. (2016) · Proceedings of The 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k16-1002 · Cited by 2,061
Practical markov chain monte carlo
Geyer, C. J. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011137 · Cited by 2,045
Deformable medical image registration: a survey
Sotiras, A., Davatzikos, C., & Paragios, N. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2013.2265603 · Cited by 1,587
“In the rst case, one may cite Iterated Conditional Modes (ICM) [383] and Highest Con dence First (HCF) [384, 385].”
Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain
Van Leemput, K., Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., & Suetens, P. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.811270 · Cited by 1,024
Gur, R. C., Turetsky, B. I., Matsui, M., Yan, M., Bilker, W., Hughett, P., & Gur, R. E. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-10-04065.1999 · Cited by 909
Roth, S., & Black, M. J. (2009) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-008-0197-6 · Cited by 847
Global estimation of burned area using MODIS active fire observations
Giglio, L., van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Collatz, G. J., & Kasibhatla, P. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-957-2006 · Cited by 635
Classification in Networked Data: A Toolkit and a Univariate Case Study
(2007) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/1248659.1248693 · Cited by 452
Genomic anatomy of the hippocampus
Thompson, C. L., Pathak, S. D., Jeromin, A., Ng, L. L., MacPherson, C. R., Mortrud, M. T., Cusick, A., Riley, Z. L., Sunkin, S. M., Bernard, A., et al. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.008 · Cited by 403
Automatic breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey
Xian, M., Zhang, Y., Cheng, H. D., Xu, F., Zhang, B., & Ding, J. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.012 · Cited by 284
“The energy function of MRF-MAP can be optimized by using Simulated Annealing (SA) [14] and Iterated Conditional Mode (ICM) [15] algorithms.”
MethodInfluentialMedical image segmentation on GPUs – A comprehensive review
Smistad, E., Falch, T. L., Bozorgi, M., Elster, A. C., & Lindseth, F. (2015) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2014.10.012 · Cited by 264
A survey of methods for 3D histology reconstruction
Pichat, J., Iglesias, J. E., Yousry, T., Ourselin, S., & Modat, M. (2018) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2018.02.004 · Cited by 207
Training an Active Random Field for Real-Time Image Denoising
Barbu, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2009.2028254 · Cited by 105
Distributed deep learning across multisite datasets for generalized CT hemorrhage segmentation
Remedios, S. W., Roy, S., Bermudez, C., Patel, M. B., Butman, J. A., Landman, B. A., & Pham, D. L. (2020) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.13880 · Cited by 37
Content-based image retrieval of digitized histopathology in boosted spectrally embedded spaces
Sridhar, A., Doyle, S., & Madabhushi, A. (2015) · Journal of Pathology Informatics · doi:10.4103/2153-3539.159441 · Cited by 34
GPU-accelerated MRF segmentation algorithm for SAR images
Sui, H., Peng, F., Xu, C., Sun, K., & Gong, J. (2012) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.001 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Besag, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-07-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-279
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W1554544485
- Cited by
- 4,191
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
