The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fractional Bayes Factors for Model Comparison
Abstract
SUMMARY: Bayesian comparison of models is achieved simply by calculation of posterior probabilities of the models themselves. However, there are difficulties with this approach when prior information about the parameters of the various models is weak. Partial Bayes factors offer a resolution of the problem by setting aside part of the data as a training sample. The training sample is used to obtain an initial informative posterior distribution of the parameters in each model. Model comparison is then based on a Bayes factor calculated from the remaining data. Properties of partial Bayes factors are discussed, particularly in the context of weak prior information, and they are found to have advantages over other proposed methods of model comparison. A new variant of the partial Bayes factor, the fractional Bayes factor, is advocated on grounds of consistency, simplicity, robustness and coherence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berger, J. O., & Delampady, M. (1987) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013238 · Cited by 664
Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
Berger, J. O., & Sellke, T. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289131 · Cited by 548
Cited by
Gelman, A. (2006) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/06-ba117a · Cited by 4,050
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194105 · Cited by 2,490
(2013) · Cited by 1,351
A Reference Bayesian Test for Nested Hypotheses and its Relationship to the Schwarz Criterion
Kass, R. E., & Wasserman, L. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476592 · Cited by 1,253
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022790 · Cited by 977
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Hagan, A.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-01-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-118
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W42051514
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fractional Bayes Factors for Model Comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02017.x
- The paper
- O'Hagan, A. (1995). Fractional Bayes Factors for Model Comparison. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02017.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.