Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Reference Bayesian Test for Nested Hypotheses and its Relationship to the Schwarz Criterion

Kass, Robert E., Wasserman, Larry·1995·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

To compute a Bayes factor for testing H 0: ψ = ψ0 in the presence of a nuisance parameter β, priors under the null and alternative hypotheses must be chosen. As in Bayesian estimation, an important problem has been to define automatic, or “reference,” methods for determining priors based only on the structure of the model. In this article we apply the heuristic device of taking the amount of information in the prior on ψ equal to the amount of information in a single observation. Then, after transforming β to be “null orthogonal” to ψ, we take the marginal priors on β to be equal under the null and alternative hypotheses. Doing so, and taking the prior on ψ to be Normal, we find that the log of the Bayes factor may be approximated by the Schwarz criterion with an error of order O p (n −½), rather than the usual error of order O p (1). This result suggests the Schwarz criterion should provide sensible approximate solutions to Bayesian testing problems, at least when the hypotheses are nested. When instead the prior on ψ is elliptically Cauchy, a constant correction term must be added to the Schwarz criterion; the result then becomes a multidimensional generalization of Jeffreys's method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476592

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Berger, J. O. and Pericchi, L. R. “The Intrinsic Bayes Factor for Linear Models,”. The Proceedings of the Fifth Valencia Conference on Bayesian Statistics.
  2. DiCiccio T., 1995, “Computing Bayes Factors by Combining Simulation and Large Sample Approximations,”
  3. Doob, J. L. “Application of the Theory of Martingales,”. Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Paris. pp.23–27.
  4. Finney D. J., 1947, Biometrika, 34, 320, 10.1093/biomet/34.3-4.320 · doi:10.1093/biomet/34.3-4.320
  5. Hsiao C. K., 1994, “Bayesian Tests of Extra Binomial Variability With Emphasis on the Boundary Case,”
  6. Kass R. E., 1990, Essays in Honor of George Barnard, 473
  7. Kass R., 1992, “Improving the Laplace Approximation Using Posterior Simulation,”
  8. Kass, R. and Wasserman, L. Comment on Berger and Pericchi's “The Intrinsic Bayes Factor for Linear Models,”. Proceedings of the Fifth Valencia Conference on Bayesian Statistics.
  9. Raftery A. E., 1994, “Hypothesis Testing and Model Selection Via Posterior Simulation,”

Cited by

See all 1,253

Metadata

Authors
Kass, R. E., & Wasserman, L.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1995-09
Volume
90
Issue
431
Pages
928-934
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W1985593448
Cited by
1,253
References
15
FWCI
10.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Reference Bayesian Test for Nested Hypotheses and its Relationship to the Schwarz Criterion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476592
The paper
Kass, R. E., & Wasserman, L. (1995). A Reference Bayesian Test for Nested Hypotheses and its Relationship to the Schwarz Criterion. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476592

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.