The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative methods for the control of postharvest citrus diseases
Abstract
The postharvest diseases of citrus fruit cause considerable losses during storage and transportation. These diseases are managed principally by the application of synthetic fungicides. However, the increasing concern for health hazards and environmental pollution due to chemical use has required the development of alternative strategies for the control of postharvest citrus diseases. Management of postharvest diseases using microbial antagonists, natural plant-derived products and Generally Recognized As Safe compounds has been demonstrated to be most suitable to replace the synthetic fungicides, which are either being banned or recommended for limited use. However, application of these alternatives by themselves may not always provide a commercially acceptable level of control of postharvest citrus diseases comparable to that obtained with synthetic fungicides. To provide more effective disease control, a multifaceted approach based on the combination of different postharvest treatments has been adopted. Actually, despite the distinctive features of these alternative methods, several reasons hinder the commercial use of such treatments. Consequently, research should emphasize the development of appropriate tools to effectively implement these alternative methods to commercial citrus production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents
Cowan, M. M. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.4.564 · Cited by 9,043
Biological effects of essential oils—A review
Bakkali, F., Averbeck, S., Averbeck, D., & Idaomar, M. (2008) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106 · Cited by 7,929
Carson, C. F., Mee, B. J., & Riley, T. V. (2002) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.46.6.1914-1920.2002 · Cited by 975
Tripathi, P., & Dubey, N. K. (2004) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.11.005 · Cited by 786
Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm?
Droby, S., Wisniewski, M., Macarisin, D., & Wilson, C. (2009) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009 · Cited by 758
Potential antimicrobial uses of essential oils in food: is citrus the answer?
Fisher, K., & Phillips, C. (2008) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2007.11.006 · Cited by 644
Review: Utilization of antagonistic yeasts to manage postharvest fungal diseases of fruit
Liu, J., Sui, Y., Wisniewski, M., Droby, S., & Liu, Y. (2013) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.09.004 · Cited by 521
Caccioni, D. R. L., Guizzardi, M., Biondi, D. M., Renda, A., & Ruberto, G. (1998) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00099-3 · Cited by 385
Droby, S., Vinokur, V., Weiss, B., Cohen, L., Daus, A., Goldschmidt, E. E., & Porat, R. (2002) · Phytopathology® · doi:10.1094/phyto.2002.92.4.393 · Cited by 325
Saravanakumar, D., Ciavorella, A., Spadaro, D., Garibaldi, A., & Gullino, M. L. (2008) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.11.006 · Cited by 224
Alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of citrus postharvest green and blue moulds
(2008) · Stewart Postharvest Review · doi:10.2212/spr.2008.2.2 · Cited by 205
Control of storage diseases of citrus by pre- and postharvest application of salts
Youssef, K., Ligorio, A., Sanzani, S. M., Nigro, F., & Ippolito, A. (2012) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.05.004 · Cited by 117
Control of Citrus Green and Blue Molds with Garlic Extracts
Obagwu, J., & Korsten, L. (2003) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1023/a:1022839921289 · Cited by 79
Friel, D., Pessoa, N. M. G., Vandenbol, M., & Jijakli, M. H. (2007) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-20-4-0371 · Cited by 62
Cited by
Exploitation of microbial antagonists for the control of postharvest diseases of fruits: a review
Dukare, A. S., Paul, S., Nambi, V. E., Gupta, R. K., Singh, R., Sharma, K., & Vishwakarma, R. K. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1417235 · Cited by 510
Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Fu, X., Li, Y., & Wang, Q. (2016) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.12.021 · Cited by 151
Lopes, M. R., Klein, M. N., Ferraz, L. P., da Silva, A. C., & Kupper, K. C. (2015) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2015.04.003 · Cited by 86
Effect of sodium dehydroacetate on the development of sour rot on Satsuma mandarin
Duan, X., OuYang, Q., Jing, G., & Tao, N. (2016) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.01.011 · Cited by 48
Chen, C., Chen, J., & Wan, C. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8040536 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Talibi, I., Boubaker, H., Boudyach, E. H., & Ait Ben Aoumar, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-04-03
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122332484
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 12.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
