Cited by 112Dermatology and Skin DiseasesSkin Protection and AgingOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Shift in skin microbiota of Western European women across aging

Open access
Jugé, R., Rouaud-Tinguely, P., Breugnot, J., Servaes, K., Grimaldi, C., Roth, M.-P., Coppin, H., Closs, B.·2018·Journal of Applied Microbiology

Abstract

AIMS: The objective of our study was to compare the microbiota diversity between two different age groups of Western European women. METHODS AND RESULTS: Skin-swab samples were collected directly on the forehead of 34 healthy Western European women: 17 younger (21-31 years old) and 17 older individuals (54-69 years old). Bacterial communities were evaluated using the 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Data revealed a higher alpha diversity on the skin of older individuals compared with younger ones. Overall microbiota structure was different between the two age groups, as demonstrated by beta diversity analysis, which also highlighted a high interpersonal variation within older individuals. Furthermore, taxonomic composition analysis showed both an increase in Proteobacteria and a decrease in Actinobacteria on the older skin. At the genus level, older skin exhibited a significant increase in Corynebacterium and a decrease in Propionibacterium relative abundance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed a shift in the distribution of skin microbiota during chronological aging in Western European women. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: Altogether these results could become the basis to develop new approaches aiming to rebalance the skin microbiota, which is modified during the aging process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jam.13929

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proteobacteria and Corynebacterium were reported to be the predominant phylum and genus, respectively, on the skin with aging.

    “Proteobacteria and Corynebacterium were reported to be the predominant phylum and genus, respectively, on the skin with aging [60,61].”

    From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [60]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jugé, R., Rouaud-Tinguely, P., Breugnot, J., Servaes, K., Grimaldi, C., Roth, M.-P., Coppin, H., & Closs, B.
Affiliations
  • Silab (France) (FR)
  • R&D department; SILAB; Brive-la-Gaillarde France
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Published
2018-06-29
Volume
125
Issue
3
Pages
907-916
ISSN
1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804611869
Cited by
112
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
11.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
skin microbiome, chronological aging, women, bacterial diversity, Proteobacteria, actinobacteria, Corynebacterium, Propionibacterium, Western Europe
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Bacteria, Europe, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Skin, Young Adult, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review