Cited by 17Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Heritability Estimates for Temperament-Related Traits in Beef and Dairy Cattle Populations

Open access
Pinto, Luís Fernando Batista, Medrado, Bruno Delphino, Pedrosa, Victor Breno, Brito, Luiz F.·2025·Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics

Abstract

Temperament (docility) is a key breeding goal in the cattle industry due to its direct relationship with animal welfare, cattle handler's safety and animal productivity. Over the past six decades, numerous studies have reported heritability estimates for temperament-related traits in cattle populations ranging from low to high values. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive systematic review with meta-analysis to obtain weighted estimates of heritability for temperament-related traits in worldwide cattle populations. After data editing and quality control, 106 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 29.2% and 70.8% reported estimates of heritability for temperament-related traits in dairy and beef cattle populations, respectively. Meta-analyses were performed for 95 heritability estimates using a random model approach. The weighted heritability estimates were as follow: (a) flight score at weaning = 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15-0.32); (b) flight speed at weaning = 0.30 (95% CI: 0.26-0.33); (c) joint analysis of flight speed and flight score at weaning = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.22-0.31); (d) flight speed at yearling = 0.26 (95% CI: 0.21-0.30); (e) joint analysis of flight speed at weaning and yearling = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.24-0.30); (f) movement score = 0.12 (95% CI: 0.08-0.15); (g) crush score at weaning = 0.21 (95% CI: 0.17-0.25); (h) pen score at weaning = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.19-0.34); (i) pen score at yearling = 0.20 (95% CI: 0.17-0.23); (j) joint analysis of pen score at weaning and yearling = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.18-0.26); (k) cow's aggressiveness at calving = 0.10 (95% CI: 0.01-0.19); (l) general temperament = 0.13 (95% CI: 0.06-0.19); (m) milking temperament = 0.16 (95% CI: 0.11-0.21); and (n) joint analysis of general and milking temperament = 0.14 (95% CI: 0.11-0.18). The heterogeneity index ranged from 0% to 77%, and the Q-test was significant (p < 0.05) for four single-trait meta-analyses. In conclusion, temperament is moderately heritable in beef cattle populations, and flight speed at weaning had the highest weighted heritability estimate. Moreover, between-study heterogeneity was low or moderate in beef cattle traits, suggesting reasonable standardization across studies. On the other hand, low-weighted heritability and high between-study heterogeneity were estimated for temperament-related traits in dairy cattle, suggesting that more studies are needed to better understand the genetic inheritance of temperament in dairy cattle populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jbg.12874

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Temperament traits such as flight speed in beef cattle are heritable and directly impact an animal's response to human handling.

    “Behaviorally, temperament traits such as flight speed in beef cattle are known to be heritable [132,133], directly impacting an animal’s response to human handling during milking, transport, and calving.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fordyce, G., Goddard, M. E., & Seifert, G. W. (1982). The measurement of temperament in cattle and the effect of experience and genotype. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production, 14, 329– 332.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinto, L. F. B., Medrado, B. D., Pedrosa, V. B., & Brito, L. F.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
  • Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Baiano (BR)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Pinto, Luís Fernando Batista
Venue
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-05-29
Volume
142
Issue
1
Pages
1-23
ISSN
  • 0044-3581 (ISSN-L)
  • 0931-2668
  • 1439-0388
OpenAlex
W4399130960
Cited by
17
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
heritability, cattle temperament, docility, beef cattle, dairy cattle, flight speed, movement score, animal welfare, genetic parameters, breeding objectives, weaning, yearlings, calving, dystocia
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Breeding, Cattle, Dairying, Female, Phenotype, Temperament, Quantitative Trait, Heritable

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review