Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Historical fire and bamboo dynamics in western Amazonia

McMichael, Crystal H., Bush, Mark B., Silman, Miles R., Piperno, Dolores R., Raczka, Marco, Lobato, Luiz C., Zimmerman, Monica, Hagen, Stephen, Palace, Michael·2013·Journal of Biogeography

Abstract

Aim: To determine if recurrent fire accounts for bamboo‐dominated forests that cover about 180,000 km 2 of western Amazonia. Location: Western Amazonia, including Los Amigos and Cocha Cashu, Peru, and Acre, Brazil. Methods: We identified bamboo (B+) and closed‐canopy forests (B−) using a combination of MODIS imagery, Landsat TM imagery and field surveys. Local‐scale and landscape‐scale patterns of historical bamboo dynamics were analysed by collecting soil cores from B+ and B− sites across three regions. Soil charcoal within cores was used to document previous fire, and phytoliths were employed to reconstruct vegetational patterns through time. Results: Fire occurred in B+ and B− sites with approximately equal frequencies in each region sampled. Between regions, fire signals were most prevalent at Los Amigos, with Cocha Cashu and Acre sites typically containing only trace amounts of charcoal. Vegetational state remained constant through time in both B+ and B− forests of Cocha Cashu and Acre. The persistence of bamboo through time is less clear at Los Amigos, with bamboo presence changing both spatially and temporally. Main conclusions: Fire does not appear to be the driving mechanism behind current bamboo distributions, although it may facilitate bamboo invasion. Once established in an area, bamboo persistently dominates the vegetation structure over historical time‐scales at some sites (Cocha Cashu and Acre), but not at others (Los Amigos), which is likely to be a function of patch origin. Increasing human activity, including fire and deforestation, combined with predicted Amazonian drought, may allow bamboo to expand from its current distribution and replace typical Amazonian closed‐canopy forests. These structural changes in the forests have important implications for carbon storage, as Amazonian forests are currently the largest terrestrial carbon sink in the world.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jbi.12002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most soil surveys in the westernmost and interfluvial forests contain no evidence of terra pretas.

    “Less is known of terra preta occurrence in the westernmost and interfluvial forests, though most soil surveys in these areas contain no evidence of terra pretas [10,33-38] (figure 1).”

    From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [36]

  • The geoglyph-rich region at least partially overlaps with expansive bamboo-dominated forests in Amazonia that have persisted in the landscape for thousands of years.

    “Interestingly, the geoglyph-rich region at least partially overlaps with expansive bamboo-dominated forests in Amazonia (figure 2) [62] that have persisted in the landscape for thousands of years [36].”

    From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [36]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Abramoff M.D., 2004, Image processing with ImageJ, Biophotonics International, 11, 36
  2. Absy M., 1991, Occurrence of four episodes of rain‐forest regression in southeastern Amazonia during the last 60,000 years – 1st comparison with other tropical regions, Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences Série II, 312, 673
  3. Balee W., 1989, Resource management in Amazonia: indigenous and folk strategies, 1
  4. 10.1098/rstb.2007.0013 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1371/journal.pone.0033373 · DOI
  6. 10.1017/S0376892900031428 · DOI
  7. Bush M.B., 2003, Global change in the Holocene
  8. Bush M.B., 2004, Holocene climate change
  9. 10.1002/jqs.883 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/978-3-540-48842-2_3 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01704.x · DOI
  12. 10.1098/rstb.2007.0014 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Bystriakova N., 2004, Bamboo biodiversity: Africa
  14. 10.1007/978-3-642-59171-6_3 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.1998.00286.x · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00059-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s00704-004-0049-4 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.04.007 · DOI
  19. Foster R.B., 1990, Four Neotropical rainforests, 99
  20. Gentry A.H., 1990, Four Neotropical rainforests, 542
  21. 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00214-1 · DOI
  22. 10.1017/S0266467406003361 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.03.002 · DOI
  24. Janovec J., 2003, Description of the Los Amigos Conservation Area
  25. 10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.002023 · DOI
  26. Judziewicz E.J., 1999, American bamboos
  27. Kadambi K., 1949, On the ecology and silviculture of Dendrocalamus strictus in the bamboo forests of Bhadrvati Division, Mysore State, and comparative notes on the species Bambusa arundinacea, Ochladra travancorica, Oxytenanthera monostigma and O. stocksii, Indian Forester, 75, 289
  28. 10.1086/303243 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.1997.tb00011.x · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s11284-008-0492-2 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s00442-010-1707-0 · DOI
  32. 10.1139/x04-071 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.0804619106 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1590/S0044-59672004000100008 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.290.5500.2291 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1098/rstb.2007.0019 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1177/0959683611414932 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1126/science.1219982 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1080/02757259409532239 · DOI
  40. Nelson B.W., 2006, VII Seminário em Atualizacão em Sensoriamento Remoto e Sistemas de Informações Geográficas Aplicados à Engenharia Florestal, 529
  41. Nelson B.W., 2005, Anais XII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, 1629
  42. Nelson B.W., 1998, Anais IX Simposio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, 1471
  43. Nelson B.W., 2001, Anais X Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, 1683
  44. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00772.x · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.12.007 · DOI
  46. Nor M.N., 1985, Recent research on bamboos, 45
  47. 10.1191/095968300667442551 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00346-7 · DOI
  49. Oliveira A.C.A., 2000, Efeitos do Bambu Guadua weberbaueri Pilger sobre a fisionomia e estrutura de uma floresta no sudoeste da Amazônia
  50. Olivier J., 2008, Gramíneas (Poaceae) bambusiformes del Río de Los Amigos, Madre de Dios, Perú, Revista Peruana de Biología, 15, 121, 10.15381/rpb.v15i1.1688 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2008.06.001 · DOI
  52. Piperno D.R., 2006, Phytoliths: a comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists
  53. 10.1006/qres.1996.0020 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Pitman N.C.A., 2008, An overview of the Los Amigos watershed, Madre de Dios, southeastern Peru
  55. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2651:TSDIAU]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  56. 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2101:DADOTS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  57. 10.1890/05-0404 · DOI
  58. 10.1086/323593 · DOI
  59. Sanford R.L., 2000, Wilderness science in a time of change. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Proc. RMRS‐P‐000
  60. Shenxue J., 2004, Training manual of bamboo charcoal for producers and consumers
  61. 10.1007/s12231-011-9151-6 · DOI
  62. Silman M.R., 2003, Alto Purus: biodiversity, conservation, and management, 63
  63. Silveira M., 1999, Ecological aspects of bamboo‐dominated forest in southwestern Amazonia: an ethnoscience perspective, Ecotropica, 5, 213
  64. Smith M., 2000, Efeito de perturbações sobre a abundância, biomassa e arquitetura de Guadua weberbaueri Pilg. (Poaceae – Bambusoideae) em uma floresta dominada por bambu no Sudoeste da Amazônia
  65. 10.1017/S026646741000057X · DOI
  66. 10.2307/2510627 · DOI
  67. Terborgh J., 1990, Four Neotropical rainforests, 48
  68. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01606.x · DOI
  69. Torezan J.M.D., 2000, The biomass of bamboo (Guadua weberbaueri Pilger) in open forest of the southwestern Amazon, Ecotropica, 6, 71
  70. 10.1007/s00442-004-1598-z · DOI
  71. 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.001033 · DOI
  72. 10.1191/0959683605hl795rr · DOI
  73. Whitmore T., 1998, An introduction to tropical rain forests, 10.1093/oso/9780198501480.001.0001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McMichael, C. H., Bush, M. B., Silman, M. R., Piperno, D. R., Raczka, M., Lobato, L. C., Zimmerman, M., Hagen, S., & Palace, M.
Affiliations
  • Florida Institute of Technology Department of Biological Sciences Melbourne FL 32901 USA
  • Wake Forest University Department of Biology Winston‐Salem NC 27106 USA
  • Department of Anthropology, Program in Human Ecology and Archaeobiology Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History Washington DC 20560 USA
  • Universidade Federal de Rondônia Núcleo de Ciência e Tecnologia, Laboratório de Geografia Humana e Planejamento Ambiental Porto Velho Brazil
  • Applied GeoSolutions Durham NH 03824 USA
  • University of New Hampshire Earth System Research Center Durham NH 03824 USA
Venue
Journal of Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-24
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
299-309
ISSN
  • 0305-0270
  • 1365-2699
Cited by
35
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0742301, 0743666)
  • Florida Institute of Technology
  • Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (NNX10AM14G)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review