Cited by 372Education and Technology IntegrationMobile Learning in EducationChild Development and Digital Technology

Tablet use in schools: a critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes

Open access
Haßler, B., Major, L., Hennessy, S.·2016·Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Abstract

The increased popularity of tablets in general has led to uptake in education. We critically review the literature reporting use of tablets by primary and secondary school children across the curriculum, with a particular emphasis on learning outcomes. The systematic review methodology was used, and our literature search resulted in 33 relevant studies meeting the inclusion criteria. A total of 23 met the minimum quality criteria and were examined in detail (16 reporting positive learning outcomes, 5 no difference and 2 negative learning outcomes). Explanations underlying these observations were analysed, and factors contributing to successful uses of tablets are discussed. While we hypothesize how tablets can viably support children in completing a variety of learning tasks (across a range of contexts and academic subjects), the fragmented nature of the current knowledge base, and the scarcity of rigorous studies, makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. The generalizability of evidence is limited, and detailed explanations as to how, or why, using tablets within certain activities can improve learning remain elusive. We recommend that future research moves beyond exploration towards systematic and in‐depth investigations building on the existing findings documented here.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcal.12123

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 138 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [65]65. Oliviera, J. (2014). Students' and teachers' attitudes and views on employing the use of iPads in science lessons (MPhil Dissertation). University of Cambridge.
  2. [73]73. Pittarello, F., & Bertani, L. (2012). CASTOR: learning to create context-sensitive and emotionally engaging narrations in-situ. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 1-10). ACM.
  3. [76]76. Price, A. (2011). Making a difference with smart tablets. Teacher Librarian, 39(1), 31-34.
  4. [92]92. Bjerede, M., & Bondi, T. (2012). Learning is personal: Stories of Android Tablet Use in the 5th Grade. Learning Untethered. Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes 39
  5. [97]97. Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student motivation: Learning in a mobile age. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 82-96. doi:10.1111/jcal.12036 · DOI
  6. [103]103. Culén, A. L., & Gasparini, A. (2011). iPad: a new classroom technology? A report from two pilot studies. INFuture Proceedings, 199-208.
  7. [108]108. Falloon, G., & Khoo, E. (2014). Exploring young students' talk in iPad-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, (0), -. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.008 · DOI
  8. [112]112. Henderson, S., & Yeow, J. (2012). iPad in education: A case study of iPad adoption and use in a primary school. In In 45th International Conference on System Science (HICSS) 2012 (pp. 78-87). IEEE.
  9. [117]117. Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of Tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers' perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 525- 534.
  10. [139]139. Nikolic, V., Krnelic, L. Z., Kolaric, D., & Nikolic, M. (2013). Tablet learning environment in iSchool Vežica. In Information & Communication Technology Electronics & Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2013 36th International Convention on (pp. 526-528). IEEE.
  11. [141]141. Osmon, P. (2011). Tablets are coming to a school near you. Proceedings of the British Society for Research in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, 31(1), 115-120.
  12. [143]143. Pellerin, M. (2013). E-inclusion in Early French Immersion Classrooms: Using Digital Technologies to Support Inclusive Practices That Meet the Needs of All Learners. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(1).
  13. [146]146. Rick, J. (2012). Proportion: a tablet app for collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 316-319). ACM.
  14. [149]149. Saine, P. (2012). iPods, iPads, and the SMARTBoard: Transforming literacy instruction and student learning. New England Reading Association Journal, 47(2), 74-79.
  15. [155]155. Van de Bogart, W. (2012). Developing Multi-literacy Skills in e-Learning Environment using Tablet Computers at the Primary Grade Level in Thailand. In International e- Learning Conference 2012 (IEC2012). Nonthaburi, Thailand: Thailand Cyber University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Haßler, B.
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-13
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
139-156
ISSN
  • 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2729
OpenAlex
W1041173458
Cited by
372
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 1
FWCI
154.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Arm
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
tablets in education, learning outcomes, elementary school students, high school students, educational technology, tablet-based learning, academic disciplines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review