Cited by 263Artificial Intelligence in EducationEducational Technology and PedagogyArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

AI in teacher education: Unlocking new dimensions in teaching support, inclusive learning, and digital literacy

Open access
Zhang, Jia, Zhang, Zhuo·2024·Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Abstract

Background: AI can positively influence teaching by offering support for classroom management, creating inclusive learning environments, enhancing digital skills, personalizing teaching methods, and strengthening teacher‐student relationships. Objectives: This quantitative research study investigates the opportunities, difficulties, and consequences of incorporating AI into teacher education. Methods: Data were collected through structured questionnaires from 202 college students and 68 staff members. The analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Results: The study provides a novel contribution by its thorough investigation of the diverse effects of AI on teacher education. It offers beneficial perspectives on the possible benefits and challenges, illuminating the far‐reaching changes that AI could bring to the terrain of learning and instruction and teaching methods in the time yet to come. The research sought to assess the effect of AI adoption in teacher education across five main dimensions: (i) its influence on teaching support and classroom management, (ii) its role in creating inclusive and accessible learning environments, (iii) its contribution to improving teachers' digital literacy and computer skills, and enhancing access to digital teaching resources, (iv) its positive influence on identifying students' learning styles and facilitating the adoption of diverse teaching methods, and (v) its role in strengthening teacher‐student relationships through improved interactions. Conclusion: The findings elucidate the promising opportunities that AI presents in the field of teacher education, along with the obstacles that require resolution for the effective fusion of AI educational settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcal.12988

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies conceptualize the integration of AI into teaching in relation to AI-TPACK, highlighting the need for teachers to develop competencies that enable them to critically and pedagogically integrate AI technologies into instructional practices.

    “Recent studies have also begun to conceptualize this integration in relation to AI-TPACK, highlighting the need for teachers to develop competencies that enable them to critically and pedagogically integrate AI technologies into instructional practices (Dilek et al., 2025; Zhang & Zhang, 2024).”

    From Integrating artificial intelligence into preservice teacher education: enhancing AI literacy and digital material design competency (2026) · cites this paper as Zhang & Zhang, 2024

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. McArdle, L. (2022). Artificial intelligence and inclusive education: Specula- tive futures and emerging practices. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 11(2), 210-211. https://ojed.org/index.php/jise/article/ view/5310
  2. Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2021). Artificial intelligence and education. Guid- ance for policy-makers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cul- tural Organization (UNESCO). https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350 · DOI · Paper page
  3. van der Vorst, T., & Jelicic, N. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Can AI bring the full potential of personalized learning to education? In 30th European regional ITS conference, Helsinki 2019 205222. Inter- national Telecommunications Society (ITS).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z.
Affiliations
Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Zhuo
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-04-25
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
1871-1885
ISSN
  • 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2729
OpenAlex
W4395452762
Cited by
263
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 123 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 28
FWCI
98.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, teacher professional development, classroom management, inclusive learning, digital literacy, personalized teaching, teacher-student relationship, learning styles, digital teaching resources, AI adoption barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review