Cited by 11Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutPsychiatric care and mental health services

Improving the culture of safety on a high‐acuity inpatient child/adolescent psychiatric unit by mindfulness‐based stress reduction training of staff

Hallman, Ilze S., O'Connor, Nancy, Hasenau, Susan, Brady, Stephanie·2017·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing

Abstract

Problem: The purpose of this study was to reduce perceived levels of interprofessional staff stress and to improve patient and staff safety by implementing a brief mindfulness‐based stress reduction (MBSR) training program on a highacuity psychiatric inpatient unit. Methods: A one‐group repeated measure design was utilized to measure the impact of the (MBSR) training program on staff stress and safety immediately posttraining and at 2 months. Two instruments were utilized in the study: the Toronto Mindfulness Scale and the Perceived Stress Scale. Findings: The MBSR program reduced staff stress across the 2‐month post‐training period and increased staff mindfulness immediately following the brief training period of 8 days, and across the 2‐month post‐training period. A trend toward positive impact on patient and staff safety was also seen in a decreased number of staff call‐ins, decreased need for 1:1 staffing episodes, and decreased restraint use 2 months following the training period. Conclusions: A brief MBSR training program offered to an interprofessional staff of a high‐acuity inpatient adolescent psychiatric unit was effective in decreasing their stress, increasing their mindfulness, and improving staff and patient safety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcap.12191

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hallman, I. S., O'Connor, N., Hasenau, S., & Brady, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Professor and Chair, Nursing Graduate Program Madonna University Livonia Michigan USA
  • Madonna University (US)
  • Ascension (US)
Corresponding author
Hallman, Ilze S.
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
175-180
ISSN
  • 1073-6077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6171
OpenAlex
W4242861756
Cited by
11
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, staff stress, mindfulness, patient safety, staff safety, safety culture, restraint use, staffing requirements, Perceived Stress Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review