Cited by 52Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The many facets of mindfulness and the prediction of change following mindfulness‐based stress reduction (MBSR)

Open access
Gawrysiak, Michael J., Grassetti, Stevie N., Greeson, Jeffrey M., Shorey, Ryan C., Pohlig, Ryan, Baime, Michael J.·2018·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objectives: Mindfulness‐based stress reduction (MBSR) promotes numerous psychological benefits, but few studies have identified for whom MBSR is most effective. The current study tested the hypothesis that lower baseline mindfulness invites more “room to grow” and, thus, predicts greater improvement during MBSR. Method: We examined three facets of mindfulness (awareness, acceptance, decentering) among 131 MBSR participants prior to enrollment, to test the hypothesis that lower baseline mindfulness predicts greater improvements in perceived stress, positive affect (PA), and negative affect (NA) following MBSR. Results: Lower acceptance and decentering predicted greater decreases in perceived stress. Higher awareness, acceptance, and decentering predicted greater increases in PA. Higher awareness predicted greater reductions in NA. Lower decentering predicted greater reductions in NA. Conclusion: Findings partly supported the hypothesis that lower baseline mindfulness predicts greater improvement following MBSR and emphasize the importance of assessing multiple mindfulness facets given their unique, contrasting relations to outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.22521

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Roth A Fonagy P 2005 What works for whom: A critical review of psychotherapy research New York, NY Guilford

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gawrysiak, M. J., Grassetti, S. N., Greeson, J. M., Shorey, R. C., Pohlig, R., & Baime, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Delaware State University (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • Rowan University (US)
  • Ohio University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Gawrysiak, Michael J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-16
Volume
74
Issue
4
Pages
523-535
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W2746358502
Cited by
52
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
COBRE (P20-GM103653)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, mindfulness facets, awareness, acceptance, decentering, perceived stress, positive affect, negative affect, treatment response prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Aged, Awareness, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Stress, Psychological, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review